Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15367835

Ego constriction.

Linda A W Brakel
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The terms ego constriction, ego inhibition, and ego restriction have not been clearly differentiated in their usage in the literature. In this paper a rationale for "ego constriction" as an entity distinct from both ego inhibition and ego restriction is given, despite its clear similarities to each. In a person with an ego inhibition, the ego inhibits a part of its own functioning because a particular function is linked to an unacceptable impulse. It is an internalized conflict. The person with an ego restriction, in contrast, avoids psychological pain triggered from an area in the outside world by restricting activity in that area. Like each of these problems but different, a person with an ego constriction first externalizes an internalized conflict associated with important functions or activities. Then, only through a series of particular obligatory steps can the person "overcome" the ego constriction--albeit temporarily. It is noted in this paper that the function of the specified obligatory steps is structurally parallel to the rigid obligatory behavior necessary for genital gratification in the perversions. As the recognition of this distinction arose in the course of an analysis of a mental health professional, something of the necessarily shared nature of analytic work is noticeable, shining through as the background for the work of this paper.

Explore related subjects

Conflict, PsychologicalDefense MechanismsEgoFemaleFreudian TheoryHumansInhibition, PsychologicalModels, PsychologicalPsychoanalytic TherapyTerminology as TopicCase ReportsJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Linda A W Brakel. 2004. Ego constriction.. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Atajp.0000041261.99201.d1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Narrativizing errors of care: critical incident reporting in clinical practice.

This paper considers the rise across acute care settings in the industrialized world of techniques that encourage clinicians to record their experiences about adverse events they are personally involved in; that is, to share narratives about errors, mishaps or 'critical incidents'. The paper proposes that critical incident reporting and the 'root cause' investigations it affords, are both central to the effort to involve clinicians in managing and organizing their work, and a departure from established methods and approaches to achieve clinicians' involvement in these non-clinical domains of health care. We argue that critical incident narratives render visible details of the clinical work that have thus far only been discussed in closed, paperless meetings, and that, as narratives, they incite individuals to share personal experiences with parties previously excluded from knowledge about failure. Drawing on a study of 124 medical retrieval incident reports, the paper provides illustrations and interpretations of both the narrative and the meta-discursive dimensions of critical incident reporting. We suggest that, as a new and complex genre, critical incident reporting achieves three important objectives. First, it provides clinicians with a channel for dealing with incidents in a way that brings problems to light in a non-blaming way and that might therefore be morally satisfying and perhaps even therapeutic. Second, these narrations make available new spaces for the apprehension, identification and performance of self. Here, the incident report becomes a space where clinicians publicly perform concern about what happened. Third, incident reporting becomes the basis for radically altering the clinician-organization relationship. As a complex expression of clinical failure and its re-articulation into organizational meta-discourse, incident reporting puts doctors' selves and feelings at risk not just within the relative safety of personal or intra-professional relationships, but also in the normative context of organizational coordination, accountability, planning and management.

Conflict, Psychological↗
PubMed2005

[Can conflict be used as the "raw material" for health services management?].

The author examines the possibility of understanding ordinary conflicts within health care organizations as a management object. He thus proposes the use of an "analytical matrix" aimed at allowing the actors involved in conflictive situations (always in a self-analytical position) to achieve a broader understanding of such conflicts. There would be new possibilities for contractibility in the management of the health service's daily routine, as well as new shapes in the relations among workers; this would include bringing previously concealed conflicts to the surface and helping them reach the service's decision-making arena. The author also indicates possible difficulties for adopting this type of managerial practice.

Conflict, Psychological↗