Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15331280

Ventricular fibrillation: basic concepts.

Frank A Fish
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This brief overview serves as an introduction to the vast array of basic and clinical concepts that are pertinent to the basic understanding of ventricular fibrillation, its genesis, and its clinical management.

Explore related subjects

Anti-Arrhythmia AgentsElectric CountershockEpinephrineHeart AtriaHeart Conduction SystemHumansVentricular FibrillationJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Frank A Fish. 2004. Ventricular fibrillation: basic concepts.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2004.04.010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Electrical storm in patients with an implantable defibrillator: incidence, features, and preventive therapy: insights from a randomized trial.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, features, and clinical sequelae of 'electrical storm' (ES). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a prospectively designed secondary analysis of SHIELD; a randomized trial of azimilide for suppression of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) leading to implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Systematic and rigorous follow-up and blinded adjudication of ICD therapy allowed identification of all ESs (>/=3 separate VT/VF episodes leading to ICD therapies within 24 h). Of 633 ICD recipients, 148 (23%) experienced at least one ES over 1-year follow-up. No clinical predictors of ES were identified. Frequent VT episodes accounted for 91% of all ESs, with the remaining being VF alone or both VT plus VF. ES led to a 3.1-fold increase in arrhythmia-related hospitalization (95% CI 2.3-4.3; P<0.0001) compared with patients with isolated VT/VF, and to a 10.2-fold increase (95% CI 6.4-16.3; P<0.0001) compared with patients without VT/VF. Compared with placebo, azimilide (75 and 125 mg/day) reduced the risk of recurrent ES by 37% (HR=0.63, 95% CI 0.35-1.11, P=0.11) and 55% (HR=0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.87, P=0.018), respectively. However, the reduction in time-to-first ES did not reach statistical significance by both doses (75 and 125 mg) of azimilide (HR=0.82, 95% CI 0.56-1.19, P=0.29 and HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.04, P=0.07), respectively. CONCLUSION: ES is common and unpredictable in ICD recipients and it is a strong predictor of hospitalization.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed2006

Is phenytoin administration safe in a hypothermic child?

A male neonate with a Chiari malformation and a leaking myelomeningocoele underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion followed by repair of myelomeningocoele. During anaesthesia and surgery, he inadvertently became moderately hypothermic. Intravenous phenytoin was administered during the later part of the surgery for seizure prophylaxis. Following phenytoin administration, the patient developed acute severe bradycardia, refractory to atropine and adrenaline. The cardiac depressant actions of phenytoin and hypothermia can be additive. Administration of phenytoin in the presence of hypothermia may lead to an adverse cardiac event in children. As phenytoin is a commonly used drug, clinicians need to be aware of this interaction.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed2006

Atrial fibrillation: rhythm control offers no advantage over rate control for some, but not all.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is not a benign condition. Although AF is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, the management of AF remains controversial. In recent years, several clinical trials comparing rhythm control with rate control for AF management found that rhythm control offers no advantage over rate control, but the findings may not apply equally to all patients. The main point is the high risk of AF recurrence in these trials and the toxic effects and poor efficacy of presently available antiarrhythmic drugs negate the benefit of rhythm control. Rhythm control should be considered as the preferred initial therapy if sinus rhythm had been maintained in a higher proportion of patients. For the moment, the optimal strategy to treat AF should be individualized, with a bias towards rate control if patients are at high risk for arrhythmias or can be kept asymptomatic. Rhythm control may still be justified in younger patients or patients who still have symptoms despite adequate rate control. In addition, patients with new or first-episode AF often warrant at least an initial trial of rhythm control.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗