Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15314009

Multiple impacted permanent and deciduous teeth.

D Yildirim·H H Yilmaz·U Aydin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Multiple impacted teeth may be related to syndromes and metabolic disorders. In some cases, however, impaction of multiple teeth is not accompanied by a fixed complex of symptoms. A 55-year-old woman attended our clinic, as she was not comfortable with her prosthetic appliances because of erupted teeth. Panoramic and occlusal radiographs revealed 13 impacted teeth (12 permanent and 1 deciduous) in the maxilla and 15 impacted teeth (11 permanent and 4 deciduous) in the mandible. In total the patient had 28 impacted teeth. In our case, medical and family history and extraoral examination were not suggestive of any syndrome or metabolic disorder. In conclusion, radiographic examination may reveal multiple impactions in clinical absence of teeth. Lack of eruptive force and rotation of tooth buds may cause multiple impactions and additional examinations may be necessary to exclude systemic and metabolic conditions.

Explore related subjects

Dentition, PermanentFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiography, DentalRadiography, PanoramicTooth, DeciduousTooth, ImpactedCase ReportsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Yildirim, H H Yilmaz, U Aydin. 2004. Multiple impacted permanent and deciduous teeth.. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr%2F12620936

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

[Morphologic characteristics of anterior crossbite in early permanent dentition reviewed by superimposition on the template].

PURPOSE: To establish a computer-processing module to first, eliminate the factors which mislead the diagnosis of anterior crossbite and second, superimpose the individual tracing on the template to review the patient's morphologic characteristics. METHODS: First, the module would process the following steps:1.to create three templates; 2.to move the functional-shift-mandible posteriorly; 3.to standardize the potential of vertical dimension;4.to select a suitable template for superimposition; 5.to standardize the sizes of individual graph and template. Second, the module would process the five-step superimpositions: 1. X axis was superimposed and S were registered to measure the distances between Ptm points and Ar points on X axis; 2. X axis was paralleled and Ptm were registered to measure the distance between A points on X axis; 3. X axis was paralleled and A points were registered to measure the difference of anterior area between the mandibular graphs; 4.mandibular planes were superimposed and Po was registered to show the mandibular form variation; 5. Ar-Gn lines were superimposed and Ar was registered to measure the difference between the mandibular graphs. RESULTS: The module which could complete these steps was produced. With its help, the individual graph could be diagnosed with the position of maxilla and mandible, the amounts of maxillary discrepancy and jaws' dysplasia, the mandibular form and size variation. CONCLUSIONS: The module could eliminate the factors which mislead the diagnosis and review the morphologic characteristics of anterior crossbite in early permanent dentition.

Dentition, Permanent↗
PubMed2003

Contemporary permanent tooth dimensions, with comparisons to G.V. Black's data.

The tooth dimensions most commonly cited in the dental literature are those published by the famous restorative dentist G. V. Black late in the 19th century. We report here on the crown dimensions of a large series of contemporary North American Whites and show that Black's values differ significantly from modern values, but not in any consistent or predictable fashion. Black supplied no information about the nature of his sample. We suggest that it may be time to replace Black's data with modern tooth size standards.

Dentition, Permanent↗
PubMed2000

[The establishment of the model for differential diagnosis of borderline cases with anterior crossbite using fuzzy set theory].

OBJECTIVE: To introduce the fuzzy set theory to orthodontics by using the diagnostic information drawn out from the diagnosed cases to solve the problem of borderline- case diagnosis. METHOD: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 107 anterior crossbite patients in early permanent dentition were traced, measured, and 31 variables calculated. Diagnosis was made by experienced specialists and the cases were divided into three groups: dental anterior crossbite (52 cases), borderline cases (22 cases) and skeletal anterior crossbite (33 cases). Among 85 cases with accurate diagnosis we selected 70 cases to establish 6-factor model using stepwise discriminant analysis. This afforded 100 percent correct respective check and the predictive diagnosis of the other 15 cases showed that its correction rate was 93.3 percent which proved that most useful information was included. Then the contributions of the six variables were calculated and we established two sets: skeletal anterior crossbite set and dental anterior crossbite set with skeletal and dental means to be their thresholds. For each case the individual measurements of the six variables were standardized and afterwards transferred into constituent ratio and at the same time their degrees of membership of these two sets were calculated according to the distance between its location and the two thresholds. Using this fuzzy model we got the individual scores of the two sets. The diagnosis of the patient was coincident with the set of higher scores. This model was testified by 85 cases with accurate diagnosis and its correction was absolute. RESULT: 22 borderline cases were diagnosed by this model. CONCLUSION: The two-set difference were far less than that of the cases with accurate diagnosis which prove the model was reasonable.

Dentition, Permanent↗