Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15311915

[NuvaRing].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2004. [NuvaRing].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15311915/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Trends in prescribing for vulvovaginal candidiasis in the United States.

PURPOSE: To describe trends in visits to office-based physicians in the United States by females 15-64 years of age for vulvovaginal candidiasis and related antifungal prescribing. Since January 1991, intravaginal antifungal medications have been available over-the-counter in the United States to treat vulvovaginal candidiasis. METHODS: Data from the 1985 through 2001 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NAMCS) were examined. NAMCS is an annual national probability sample survey that collects data on the utilization of services provided by office-based physicians. RESULTS: The average annual visit rates for symptoms of vaginitis and a diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis decreased by 55 and 72%, respectively. The intravaginal antifungal prescribing rate for vulvovaginal candidiasis declined by 41%. No trend was found for total antifungal prescribing; however, during the late 1990s, fluconazole was prescribed at approximately one-third of visits with a diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest an increased trend in self-diagnosis and use of over-the-counter intravaginal antifungal medications. The shift from prescribing intravaginal antifungal preparations to fluconazole raises concern about the possible development of azole drug resistance. Educational efforts are needed to counter potential misuse of these medications that may contribute to increased infection with innately azole resistant non-albicans Candida species and chronic infection.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

Relationship between allopregnanolone and negative mood in postmenopausal women taking sequential hormone replacement therapy with vaginal progesterone.

OBJECTIVE: To compare severity of negative mood and physical symptoms between women with different progesterone, allopregnanolone, and pregnanolone plasma concentrations during sequential Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) with vaginal progesterone suppositories. DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. METHOD: Postmenopausal women (n=36) with climacteric symptoms were treated with 2mg estradiol daily during three 28-day cycles. Vaginal progesterone suppositories with 400, 800 mg/day or placebo were added sequentially for 14 days per cycle. Daily symptom ratings using a validated rating scale were kept. Blood samples for progesterone, allopregnanolone, and pregnanolone radioimmunoassays were collected during each treatment cycle. RESULTS: Women were divided into three groups (low, medium, and high) based on plasma allopregnanolone concentration during progesterone treatment. The concentration of allopregnanolone in the medium group corresponds to the concentration seen during the mid luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Within women with medium allopregnanolone concentration significantly more negative mood and physical symptoms were rated during progesterone treatment compared to treatment with unopposed estrogen or placebo. Between women significantly more negative mood symptoms were seen during progesterone treatment cycles with medium allopregnanolone concentration compared to cycles with low concentration. Plasma progesterone, allopregnanolone, and pregnanolone concentrations increased with increasing progesterone dose. Progesterone and allopregnanolone plasma concentrations increased 2h after vaginal administration of progesterone at 400 and 800 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Vaginal progesterone in sequential HRT causes negative mood, most likely mediated via allopregnanolone.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

Sample size formula for proportional hazards modelling of competing risks.

To test the effect of a therapeutic or prognostic factor on the occurrence of a particular cause of failure in the presence of other causes, the interest has shifted in some studies from the modelling of the cause-specific hazard to that of the subdistribution hazard. We present approximate sample size formulas for the proportional hazards modelling of competing risk subdistribution, considering either independent or correlated covariates. The validity of these approximate formulas is investigated through numerical simulations. Two illustrations are provided, a randomized clinical trial, and a prospective prognostic study.

Administration, Intravaginal↗