Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15281127

Constant-pH molecular dynamics using continuous titration coordinates.

Abstract

In this work, we explore the question of whether pK(a) calculations based on a microscopic description of the protein and a macroscopic description of the solvent can be implemented to examine conformationally dependent proton shifts in proteins. To this end, we introduce a new method for performing constant-pH molecular dynamics (PHMD) simulations utilizing the generalized Born implicit solvent model. This approach employs an extended Hamiltonian in which continuous titration coordinates propagate simultaneously with the atomic motions of the system. The values adopted by these coordinates are modulated by potentials of mean force of isolated titratable model groups and the pH to control the proton occupation at particular sites in the polypeptide. Our results for four different proteins yield an absolute average error of approximately 1.6 pK units, and point to the role that thermally driven relaxation of the protein environment in the vicinity of titrating groups plays in modulating the local pK(a), thereby influencing the observed pK1/2 values. While the accuracy of our method is not yet equivalent to methods that obtain pK1/2 values through the ad hoc scaling of electrostatics, the present approach and constant pH methods in general provide a useful framework for studying pH-dependent phenomena. Further work to improve our model to approach quantitative agreement with experiment is outlined.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael S Lee, Freddie R Salsbury, Charles L Brooks. 2004-09-01. Constant-pH molecular dynamics using continuous titration coordinates.. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20128

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Exosite-mediated substrate recognition of factor IX by factor XIa. The factor XIa heavy chain is required for initial recognition of factor IX.

Studies of the mechanisms of blood coagulation zymogen activation demonstrate that exosites (sites on the activating complex distinct from the protease active site) play key roles in macromolecular substrate recognition. We investigated the importance of exosite interactions in recognition of factor IX by the protease factor XIa. Factor XIa cleavage of the tripeptide substrate S2366 was inhibited by the active site inhibitors p-aminobenzamidine (Ki 28 +/- 2 microM) and aprotinin (Ki 1.13 +/- 0.07 microM) in a classical competitive manner, indicating that substrate and inhibitor binding to the active site was mutually exclusive. In contrast, inhibition of factor XIa cleavage of S2366 by factor IX (Ki 224 +/- 32 nM) was characterized by hyperbolic mixed-type inhibition, indicating that factor IX binds to free and S2366-bound factor XIa at exosites. Consistent with this premise, inhibition of factor XIa activation of factor IX by aprotinin (Ki 0.89 +/- 0.52 microM) was non-competitive, whereas inhibition by active site-inhibited factor IXa beta was competitive (Ki 0.33 +/- 0.05 microM). S2366 cleavage by isolated factor XIa catalytic domain was competitively inhibited by p-aminobenzamidine (Ki 38 +/- 14 microM) but was not inhibited by factor IX, consistent with loss of factor IX-binding exosites on the non-catalytic factor XI heavy chain. The results support a model in which factor IX binds initially to exosites on the factor XIa heavy chain, followed by interaction at the active site with subsequent bond cleavage, and support a growing body of evidence that exosite interactions are critical determinants of substrate affinity and specificity in blood coagulation reactions.

Aprotinin↗

The interaction of human tryptase-beta with small molecule inhibitors provides new insights into the unusual functional instability and quaternary structure of the protease.

Human tryptase-beta (HTbeta) is a serine protease with an atypical tetrameric structure and an unusual dependence on heparin binding or high salt for functional and structural stability. In the absence of heparin and at physiological salt, pH, and temperature, HTbeta rapidly loses activity by a reversible process that we have called spontaneous inactivation. The role of tetramer dissociation in this process is controversial. Using small irreversible or competitive inhibitors of HTbeta as stabilizing ligands, we were able to examine tetramer stability under inactivating (decay) conditions in the absence of heparin and to define further the process of spontaneous inactivation. Size exclusion chromatography showed that interaction with inhibitors stabilized the tetramer. Using sedimentation equilibrium, spontaneously inactivated HTbeta (si-HTbeta) was shown to be a destabilized tetramer that dissociates upon dilution and which in the presence of a competitive inhibitor re-formed a stable tetramer. Addition of inhibitors to si-HTbeta rescued catalytic activity as was shown after inhibitor displacement. At high concentrations of si-HTbeta (4-5 microM), the binding of inhibitor alone provided sufficient free energy for complete reactivation and tetramer stabilization, whereas at low si-HTbeta concentration (0.1 microM) where the destabilized tetramer would be mostly dissociated, reactivation required more free energy which was provided by the binding of both an inhibitor and heparin. The results demonstrate that HTbeta is a tetramer in the absence of heparin and that tetramer dissociation is a consequence of and not a prerequisite for inactivation. Heparin binding likely stabilizes the tetramer by favoring a functionally active conformation with stable intersubunit contacts, rather than by simply cross-linking active monomers.

Aprotinin↗

Forty years of clinical aprotinin use: a review of 124 hypersensitivity reactions.

Since its clinical introduction, the anaphylactic potential of aprotinin has been a major concern. World wide, its use is expanding so there is an increased chance that patients have reexposure from various sources. The risk of anaphylaxis is approximately 2.8% in reexposed patients. From 1963 to 2003, 124 cases of aprotinin-induced anaphylaxis were reported in 61 publications. Eleven patients died. The reexposure interval was less than 3 months in 72% (38 of 53 patients). This review looks at the profile of patients at risk so preventive measures may be taken. Past and future exposures have to be taken into account before any aprotinin administration.

Aprotinin↗