Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15244174

[Surface electromyography procedure].

A Labarre-Vila
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Surface electromyography (SEMG) is not yet able to substitute needle EMG for diagnosing neuromuscular diseases in our current clinical neurophysiological practice. Several research groups have been working to reach this goal. Thus, we already have available, though imperfect and open to criticism, tools to apply SEMG to follow-up studies of neuromuscular diseases. There are enough scientific data to integrate validated tools into EMG equipment, to provide recommended electrodes and developed techniques and methods for recording and analysing all SEMG components, so that we could study the suggested standardised parameters in our clinical routine context. Independently of the accuracy of clinical indications for the chosen methods, the requirements of sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility should be as substantial for ENG as for needle or surface EMG. They suppose an equal demanding procedure in doing exams and interpreting results. The respective contribution of ENG and needle or surface EMG is still to be confirmed. Respective value and limitations of the force measurements by manual or quantitative testing, functional scales, SEMG or motor unit number counting are not yet evaluated in follow-up studies of neuromuscular diseases.

Explore related subjects

Clinical ProtocolsElectromyographyHumansNeuromuscular DiseasesEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Labarre-Vila. 2004. [Surface electromyography procedure].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15244174/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Paper tigers--do clinical guidelines improve health care quality in patients with testicular germ cell tumors in Germany?

In Germany, germ cell tumors are characterized by a marked excess mortality, i.e. a discrepancy between the actual mortality and the mortality expected with adequate implementation of the standard therapy. Moreover, Germany not only has a significantly increased mortality in an international comparison but also shows marked regional differences in the quality of medical care. This is partly due to difficulties in implementing the standard therapy. An attempt was made to improve the quality of medical care by setting up evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines in 1996. Contrary to expectations, however, these guidelines have thus far remained largely ineffective, their implementation being hampered by a solely passive dissemination strategy. Added to this are inadequate medical care structures in which the guidelines cannot be properly implemented because of the organizational, social and professional context. Decisive for a quality improvement in the diagnosis, therapy and care of germ cell tumor patients is active dissemination of the guidelines supplemented by a change in the care structure. It is also important to establish indicators for measuring the success of guideline implementation and to perform continuous progress monitoring in order to specifically overcome evident barriers. Future research is required to create a better theoretical basis and to develop further strategies for guideline dissemination and implementation.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed2005

A 16-slice multidetector computed tomography protocol for evaluation of the gastroepiploic artery grafts in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Arterial coronary bypass grafts [internal mammary arteries and gastroepiploic artery (GEA)] are in widespread use for coronary surgery. Since selective catheterisation of the GEA graft to monitor patency, is often unsuccessful, a non-invasive protocol to visualise the GEA-graft from origin to anastomosis is presented using 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Twenty-six male patients (mean age 58.1+/-6.7 years) with GEA grafts were scanned according to a protocol of an ECG-synchronised cardiac scan followed by a thoracoabdominal scan. To terminate the scan at the correct anatomical level, the lowest level of the GEA was coded based on the lumbar vertebrae level. Scores ranging from one (excellent) to four (bad) were assigned to evaluate visualisation quality of the grafts. GEA grafts were assessable in 62% of the thoracoabdominal scans and 69% of the cardiac scans. On average, the lowest part of the GEA corresponded with a level between L1 and L2, in two cases in the upper part of L3. Mean visualisation score in the thoracoabdominal scans and cardiac scans was good (respectively 1.4+/-0.6 and 1.4+/-1.0). Sixteen-slice MDCT is a promising alternative for catheterisation in evaluating patency of GEA grafts, using the presented protocol with thoracoabdominal scan including L3 for complete coverage of the GEA graft.

Clinical Protocols↗