Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15239900

High throughput genotyping technologies.

Abstract

A comprehensive genetic map containing several hundred microsatellite markers resulted from a large microsatellite mapping project. This was the first real study that introduced high throughput methods to the genetic community. This map and the concurrent technological advances, which will briefly be reviewed, led to further numerous mapping investigations of simple and complex diseases. The annotated draft sequence of approximately three billion base pairs (bp) of the human genome has been completed much sooner than many imagined, due to considerable technological advancements and the international enterprise that resulted. This was a major development for the genetics community, but is only the precursor to the next phase of studying and understanding the variation within the human genome. The awareness of the differences may help us understand the effects on the genetics of the variation between individuals and disease. It is these variations at the nucleotide level that determine the physiological differences, or phenotypes of each individual, including all biological functions at the cellular and body level. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) will provide the next high density map, and be the genetic tool to study these genetic variations. There are many sources of SNPs and exhaustive numbers of methods of SNP detection to be considered. The focus in this paper will be on the merits of selected, varied SNP typing methodologies that are emerging to genotype many individuals with the required huge number of SNPs to make the study of complex diseases and pharmacogenomics a practical and economically viable option.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrew M Dearlove. 2002. High throughput genotyping technologies.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp%2F1.2.139

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗