Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15216748

[Coronary collateral circulation].

Abstract

Coronary collaterals are anastomotic connections without an intervening capillary bed between portions of the same coronary artery and between different coronary arteries. The main determinants of coronary collateral circulation are preinfarction angina, severity of coronary artery disease, significant pressure gradient and an increase in shear stress. In presence of pressure gradient the blood flow is redistributed through the preexistent arterioles that connect a high-pressure with a low-pressure area. The consequence is an increased flow velocity and therefore increased shear stress in the collateral arteries, which leads to a marked activation of the endothelium with the subsequent morphological changes, vascular remodeling and activation of growth factors involved in angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Well-developed coronary collateral circulation can be observed in 25% to 37% of patients with one vessel coronary artery disease and in 74.7% patients with extensive disease. Recruitable collaterals can be evaluated by performing coronary angiography, a qualitative or semiquantitative technique and by measurement of pressure and velocity in distal vascular beds (quantitative technique). Demonstration of well-developed collaterals in patients with angina pectoris or myocardial infarction has been associated with limited infarct size, improved ventricular function, less ventricular aneurysm formation and improved in-hospital and long-term survival.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Guering Eid-Lidt. [Coronary collateral circulation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15216748/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The meandering mesenteric artery: a historic review and surgical implications.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the literature regarding collateral mesenteric circulation with emphasis on the mesenteric meandering artery (of Moskowitz). Standard vascular embryology and anatomy are described as are the collateral mesenteric vessels that can develop with arterial stenosis or occlusion. A discussion on the correct usage of terms for describing mesenteric collateral vessels follows. METHODS: We undertook review of the historical literature to discuss the surgical implications of the meandering mesenteric artery. RESULTS: Despite a long history of study by anatomists and surgeons, confusion still persists regarding both the number and correct descriptive terminology of the collateral mesenteric vessels. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the vague historic term "arc of Riolan" should be discarded for the more precise term "meandering mesenteric artery." The meandering mesenteric artery should routinely be preserved in all surgical procedures, to include resection for cancer, given its critical function in providing collateral mesenteric circulation. Further evaluation in the asymptomatic patient, however, is unnecessary.

Collateral Circulation↗

Determining the best procedure for radial artery harvest: prospective randomized trial for early postharvest complications.

OBJECTIVE: Although useful procedures for radial artery harvest have been reported, forearm circulation and collateral perfusion after radial artery harvesting remain unknown. To assess an optimal radial artery harvest technique for forearm circulation, we designed a prospective randomized trial. METHODS: Ninety patients were divided into 3 groups of 30 patients. Electrocautery, an ultrasonic scalpel, or sharp scissors and hemoclips were used to harvest radial arteries in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The incidences of harvest site pain, numbness, swelling, discomfort, hematoma, and infection were compared. With forearm thermography, recovery times from cooled down 5 degrees back to rest temperature were compared between groups. All patients had postoperative forearm angiography at 1 and 12 months. RESULTS: Although there were no differences in the incidences of pain, swelling, and discomfort, the incidence of numbness was significantly lower in group 3 (P = .003). The temperature recovery time was significantly shorter in group 3 (P = .0009). On postoperative angiography at 1 month, the incidence of the development of interosseous arteries was significantly higher in group 3 (86.7%) than in groups 1 (23.3%) and 2 (36.7%). The 12-month study, however, showed that there was no difference among groups (73.3%, 80.0%, and 93.3% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that sharp dissection with scissors and clips may be better for early postharvest forearm circulation and can decrease the incidence of hand numbness. However, there were no differences among the 3 methods with respect to forearm circulation 12 months after radial artery harvest.

Collateral Circulation↗