Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15190185

Does Makeham make sense?

Abstract

Numerical modeling was used to explore the behavior of ideal cohorts obeying the Gompertz-Makeham (GM) law of mortality (-dn/dt 1/n(t) = C + lambda egammat) supplemented with the Strehler-Mildvan (SM) correlation (ln lambda = A - Bgamma) and to show how changes in the age-independent parameter C will produce an apparent SM correlation if C is ignored in mortality data treatment as in the case of the so-called longitudinal gompertzian analysis of historical changes in human mortality patterns. The essential difference between the Makeham term C and Gompertz term lambda e(gammat) has been suggested to be not that the latter is age-dependent whereas the former is not, but that C comprises the contributions of inherently irresistible stresses to mortality, whereas lambda e(gammat) comprises the contributions of resistible stresses and shows how changes in the resistance to them are translated into changes in mortality. This assumption was used to show by modeling how the transition of stresses from irresistible to resistible may result in decreased late survivorship as the cost of increased early survivorship, in line with the antagonistic pleiotropy theory of aging. On the whole, the modeling suggests that the GM equation is not only a mathematical tool for treatment of mortality data but that it also has a fundamental biological significance, and its Makeham term C should not be ignored in any analysis of mortality data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Golubev. 2004. Does Makeham make sense?. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Abgen.0000031153.63563.58

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Barriers to screening infants for retinopathy of prematurity after discharge or transfer from a neonatal intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) practices affecting screening and follow-up for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODS: Retrospective study of infants at risk for ROP, eligible for back transport, admitted to a regional NICU from January 1, 1999 until May 31, 2002. Patients failed to receive needed follow-up for ROP after discharge or transfer from a NICU, if we could not verify their ROP screening follow-up within 1 month. RESULTS: A total of 74 infants were identified to need follow-up eye care. Infants who did not receive the follow-up care had greater mean gestational age (mean SD; 30.7+/-2.3 vs 29.6+/-2.5 weeks, p=0.05) and birth weights (mean SD; 1581+/-366 vs 1360+/-508 g, p=0.007), compared to infants who received the recommended care. Infants transported back to the community hospital were significantly more likely to miss follow-up eye care compared to infants discharged from the regional center (relative risk 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.09 to 7.20)). Infants not screened for ROP in the NICU had greater risk for missing follow-up care compared to infants who had their first retinal examination in the NICU (relative risk 4.25, 95% CI (1.42 to 12.73)). CONCLUSIONS: Infants transferred back or discharged from the NICU before ROP screening represent a high-risk group for not receiving follow-up eye care.

Cohort Studies↗

Assessing nicotine metabolism in pregnancy--a novel approach using hair analysis.

Nicotine and its metabolite cotinine are important biochemical markers to determine active or passive exposure to cigarette smoke. The amount of nicotine and cotinine in hair provides a cumulative index of tobacco exposure. This study uses segmental hair analysis to assess changes in nicotine metabolism in a cohort of pregnant women who smoked steadily during the whole gestational period according to their self-report. Maternal hair was collected at the time of delivery and sectioned into segments representing the three trimesters of pregnancy. The concentrations of nicotine and cotinine in each section of hair were measured by radioimmunoassay. Hair concentration of nicotine decreased during pregnancy without any reported reduction in smoking, while the cotinine concentration remained constant. The nicotine-cotinine ratio in these consistent smokers was: 1st trimester 20.6, 2nd trimester 19.9, and 3rd trimester 13.3. These findings are consistent with results from other studies showing increased nicotine metabolism during pregnancy. Our data suggest that the results of segmental hair analysis should be carefully examined in pregnancy. Both nicotine and cotinine levels should be evaluated in order to confirm any significant change in maternal tobacco exposure during pregnancy.

Cohort Studies↗

The growing volume of diabetes-related dialysis: a population based study.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal failure requiring dialysis is one of the most serious complications of diabetes mellitus, and diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal failure. The aim of this large, observational study is to describe the population-based incidence and prevalence rates and outcomes of diabetic individuals in Ontario, Canada who require dialysis therapy. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients, those with diabetes and those without, were created between April 1, 1994 and March 31, 2000 (total of approximately 8.4 million) and followed until March 31, 2001 using several large, linked administrative databases at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. The incidence, prevalence and mortality on dialysis for each cohort were determined. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusting for age, sex and co-morbidity, was used to determine the independent impact of diabetes on patient survival. RESULTS: The average annual incidence rate of dialysis was 12 times greater in persons with diabetes (130 per 100,000) vs without diabetes (11 per 100,000). By 1999-2000, diabetic patients comprised 51% of the incident dialysis population. The average annual prevalence rate was 10 times greater in the diabetic cohort. Patients with diabetes had more co-morbidities at the start of dialysis and poorer 3 year survival (55 vs 68%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The incident and prevalent rates of dialysis for patients with diabetes mellitus are many times the rates of those without diabetes. Patients with diabetes mellitus often start dialysis with significant co-morbidities, which may contribute to the relatively high rate of mortality on dialysis.

Cohort Studies↗