PubMed · 15174643
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Takashi Asada. 2004. [Behave-AD].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15174643/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We developed an algorithm that distinguishes between on and off states in patients with Parkinson's disease during daily life activities. Twenty-three patients were monitored continuously in a home-like situation for approximately 3 hours while they carried out normal daily-life activities. Behavior and comments of patients during the experiment were used to determine the on and off periods by a trained observer. Behavior of the patients was measured using triaxial accelerometers, which were placed at six different positions on the body. Parameters related to hypokinesia (percentage movement), bradykinesia (mean velocity), and tremor (percentage peak frequencies above 4 Hz) were used to distinguish between on and off states. The on-off detection was evaluated using sensitivity and specificity. The performance for each patient was defined as the average of the sensitivity and specificity. The best performance to classify on and off states was obtained by analysis of movements in the frequency domain with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.97. We conclude that our algorithm can distinguish between on and off states with a sensitivity and specificity near 0.97. This method, together with our previously published method to detect levodopa-induced dyskinesia, can automatically assess the motor state of Parkinson's disease patients and can operate successfully in unsupervised ambulatory conditions.
This study evaluated selected clinical and functional tests as predictors of driving safety outcomes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. A total of 25 PD patients and 21 age-matched controls, all regular drivers, underwent neurological evaluation and assessment of cognitive, visual, and motor function and a standardized, on-road driving assessment. The capacity of the tests to predict pass/fail driving outcomes was determined by selecting a subset with the highest predictive value from each domain and then subjecting these subsets to discriminant function analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined. Three relatively simple tests from the larger battery predicted passes with relatively high sensitivity (PD, 72.7%; controls, 93.8%; both combined, 85.2%); and moderate specificity (PD, 64.3%; controls, 60.0%; both combined. 63.2%). These tests assessed motor performance (Purdue Pegboard test), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson test), and cognitive function (verbal version of Symbol Digit Modalities test). Adding time since diagnosis for the PD group increased sensitivity to 90.9% and specificity to 71.4%. These simple tests confer more objectivity and predictive power to clinical recommendations for driving, they reflect distinct functions that are necessary for safe driving, and they may be especially useful when on-road assessments are not feasible.
Fear Avoidance Beliefs and physical function in elderly individuals with chronic low back pain This analysis assessed how fear avoidance beliefs (FABs) affected subjective and objective functional parameters as well as pain in elderly individuals. The study comprised 152 elderly patients with low back pain, which was attributed to spondylosis in almost half of the cases. Their average age was 70.1 years (SD=4.3, range 65-84). All of the patients participated in a physiotherapeutic program including data acquisition before treatment (t1), immediately after its completion (t2), and 6 months later (t3). FABs were assessed by a five-item scale with satisfying psychometric properties. The primary outcome criterion was function, which was evaluated as a subjective measure using the Hannover functional disability scale and as an objective measure based on the anteflexion determined by ultrasound topometry. Secondary outcome criteria were pain parameters. At the time o the first measurement (t1), the patients were classified into three groups with strong, intermediate, or weak FABs. Analyses of variance reveal an improvement of subjective functional capacity in every FAB group between t1 and t2. At t3, there is a decline of these values only in the group of the high fear avoiders. High fear avoiders also show lower values in the objective measure at all three measurement points. No influence of the FABs on the pain parameters could be determined. It would be expected that the efficacy of physiotherapy could be improved if the patients' FABs are taken into consideration when planning the treatment regimen.