Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15126649

Improving outcomes in hyperphosphataemia.

Abstract

Preclinical studies have shown that lanthanum has a very high phosphate-binding capacity at gastrointestinal pH, while clinical trials have shown lanthanum carbonate to be an effective, well-tolerated phosphate binder for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with end-stage renal disease. Optimization of bone health is an important issue in these patients, and, based on theoretical grounds, there have been concerns that lanthanum will have toxic effects on bone similar to those of aluminium. However, compared with aluminium, absorption of lanthanum is extremely low and lanthanum treatment is not associated with systemic toxicity. In addition, unlike aluminium, elimination of lanthanum is not through the kidney, but mainly takes place via the biliary route and is, therefore, independent of renal function. This implies that patients with chronic renal failure are not at an increased risk for accumulation of the element, compared with patients with normal renal function. In animal studies, no adverse effects on bone were seen in healthy animals receiving lanthanum carbonate. In 5/6th nephrectomized rats, very high doses of lanthanum (1000-2000 mg/kg) affected bone mineralization. This was not due to a direct toxic effect on bone, but was secondary to phosphate depletion induced by lanthanum and, as with any gastro-intestinal phosphate-binding agent, can be reversed with a phosphate-supplemented diet. In a phase III clinical trial, bone biopsies were taken from dialysis patients at baseline and after 1 year of treatment with either lanthanum carbonate (median dose, 1250 mg/day) or calcium carbonate (median dose, 2000 mg/day). Patients treated with lanthanum carbonate for 1 year did not experience any of the aluminium-like toxic effects on bone expressed as either osteomalacia or adynamic bone disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marc E De Broe, Patrick C D'Haese, Lanthanum Study Group. 2004. Improving outcomes in hyperphosphataemia.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt%2Fgfh1003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stochastically curtailed phase II clinical trials.

Phase II trials often test the null hypothesis H(0): p or=p(1), where p is the true unknown proportion responding to the new treatment, p(0) is the greatest response proportion which is deemed clinically ineffective, and p(1) is the smallest response proportion which is deemed clinically effective. In order to expose the fewest number of patients to an ineffective therapy, phase II clinical trials should terminate early when the trial fails to produce sufficient evidence of therapeutic activity (i.e. if p or=p(1)), the trial should declare the drug effective in the fewest patients possible to allow for advancement to a phase III comparative trial. Several statistical designs, including Simon's minimax and optimal designs, have been developed that meet these requirements. In this paper, we propose three alternative designs that rely upon stochastic curtailment based on conditional power. We compare and contrast the properties of the three approaches: (1) stochastically curtailed (SC) binomial tests, (2) stochastically curtailed (SC) Simon's optimal design, and (3) SC Simon's minimax design to those of Simon's minimax and Simon's optimal designs. For each of these designs we compare and contrast the number of opportunities for study termination, the expected sample size of the trial under the null hypothesis (p <or=p(0)), and the effective type I and type II errors. We also present graphical tools for monitoring phase II clinical trials with stochastic curtailment using conditional power.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗

Adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials.

Two-stage designs have been widely used in phase II clinical trials. Such designs are desirable because they allow a decision to be made on whether a treatment is effective or not after the accumulation of the data at the end of each stage. Optimal fixed two-stage designs, where the sample size at each stage is fixed in advance, were proposed by Simon when the primary outcome is a binary response. This paper proposes an adaptive two-stage design which allows the sample size at the second stage to depend on the results at the first stage. Using a Bayesian decision-theoretic construct, we derive optimal adaptive two-stage designs; the optimality criterion being minimum expected sample size under the null hypothesis. Comparisons are made between Simon's two-stage fixed design and the new design with respect to this optimality criterion.

Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗