Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1511368

Colon cancer overview.

P Greenwald
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The scope of current prevention research support by the National Cancer Institute includes the clinical assessment of dietary modifications and cancer screening trials, epidemiologic studies, development of new chemopreventive therapies, and the use of advanced molecular biologic technologies to probe the genetic determinants of colorectal adenomas. Colorectal cancer frequently has been associated with high-fat low-fiber diets in epidemiologic and experimental studies. A recently initiated Phase III Dietary Intervention Study of Recurrence of Large Bowel Adenomatous Polyps will investigate the potential benefits of a low-fat high-fiber fruit-and-vegetable-enriched eating pattern to decrease the polyp recurrence rate. The Chemoprevention Program currently is supporting four Phase III controlled clinical intervention trials investigating the cancer-inhibiting effects on colorectal cancer of beta-carotene, piroxicam, calcium, and calcium plus fiber in persons with previous adenomas. A proposed early detection trial will screen for colorectal, prostate, lung, and ovarian cancers. A comparison of incidence and mortality trends indicates progress in colorectal cancer detection and therapy.

Explore related subjects

Anticarcinogenic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicColonic NeoplasmsDietFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Greenwald. 1992-09-01. Colon cancer overview.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70%3A3%2B%3C1206%3A%3Aaid-cncr2820701504%3E3.0.co%3B2-j

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

The biological revolution - towards a mechanistic understanding of the impact of diet on cancer risk.

There is strong epidemiological evidence to show that differences in diet explain a significant proportion of the variation in cancer incidence worldwide. However, because of the complex nature of eating behaviour and the chemical heterogeneity of foods, it remains very difficult to ascertain which aspects of diet, in what quantities and over what time-frames are responsible for modifying risk. In addition, there are few dietary intervention studies demonstrating reduction in cancer risk. Much faster progress has been made in understanding the biological basis of cancer. It is now clear that damage to the genome resulting in aberrant expression of genes (principally suppression of tumour suppressor genes (TSGs) and inappropriate expression of oncogenes) is fundamental to tumorigenesis. It is also becoming clear that much of the inter-individual variation in cancer experience is due to differences in the amount of damage experienced and/or the capacity to repair that damage. Both of these processes are influenced strongly by dietary factors and by genetic predisposition (polymorphisms in the requisite genes). It is possible that understanding diet:gene interactions in DNA damage and in repair will not only explain much of the inter-individual variation in risk but also offer opportunities to design better dietary intervention studies aimed at chemoprevention. The Human Genome maps and the SNPs databases, together with the rapid development of tools suitable for investigating genetic and epigenetic changes in small tissue biopsies provide the means to begin to test hypotheses about the mechanisms by which diet influences cancer risk directly in human subjects. This is likely to form a significant component of the emerging science of nutrigenomics.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Frontiers in nutrigenomics, proteomics, metabolomics and cancer prevention.

While dietary habits continue to surface as a significant factor that may influence cancer incidence and tumor behavior, there is considerable scientific uncertainty about who will benefit most. Adequate [corrected] knowledge about how the responses depend on an individual's genetic background (nutrigenetic effects), the cumulative effects of food components on genetic expression profiles (nutritional transcriptomics and nutritional epigenomics effects), the occurrence and activity of proteins (proteomic effects) and/or the dose and temporal changes in cellular small molecular weight compounds (metabolomics effects) will [corrected] assist in identifying responders and non-responders. Expanding the information about similarities and differences in the "omic" responses across tissues will not only provide clues about specificity in response to bioactive food components but assist in the identification of surrogate tissues and biomarkers that can be used for predicting a response. Deciphering the importance of each of these potential sites of regulation will be particularly challenging but does hold promise in explaining many of the inconsistencies in the literature.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2004

New approaches to the role of diet in the prevention of cancers of the alimentary tract.

Cancers of the alimentary tract are, collectively, amongst the major causes of morbidity and deaths from cancer across the world today. Of the 10 million new cases of cancer diagnosed in 2000, about 2.3 million were cancers of the pharynx, oesophagus, stomach or colorectum. Nevertheless, epidemiological studies indicate that cancers of the digestive organs are also amongst the most susceptible to modification by dietary factors. International variations in incidence suggest that round three quarters of all sporadic colorectal cancers are attributable to diet. Even within the relatively uniform environment of the European Union, there are variations in the incidence of colorectal and oesophageal cancers of about two- and six-fold, respectively. Carcinomas of the alimentary tract arise from epithelial cells via distinct sequences of neoplastic change, which require a large fraction of an individual's lifespan. The best characterised of these is the adenoma-carcinoma sequence of colorectal carcinogenesis, in which progressive loss of differentiation and normal morphology in a growing lesion is associated with the acquisition of somatic mutations, and of aberrant methylation of CpG-islands, leading to gene silencing. These molecular events are accompanied by functional changes, including increased mitosis and evasion of apoptosis. There is little evidence that diet exerts its effects primarily through food-borne carcinogens that can be identified and eliminated from the food-chain. It is far more probable that the adverse effects of diet are caused largely by over-consumption of energy, coupled with inadequate intakes of protective substances, including micronutrients, dietary fibre and a variety of phytochemicals. The latter are biologically active secondary plant metabolites, many of which modify cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in vitro. There is growing evidence that such effects also occur in vivo, and that they can suppress the progress of neoplasia. Carcinomas of the oesophagus, stomach and colon all appear to be partially preventable by diets rich in fruits and vegetables. Plant foods contain a variety of components including micronutrients, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and secondary metabolites such as glucosinolates and flavonoids, many of which can inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis, and which may well act synergistically when combined in the human diet. The future challenge is to fully characterise and evaluate these effects at the cellular and molecular level, so at to exploit their full potential as protective mechanisms for the population as a whole.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗