Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15110443

Thinking.

Abstract

This paper argues that thinking is assumed within nursing education. There are strategies to promote thinking: reflective practice, critical analysis and problem solving. I suggest that by categorising thinking into such boxes there may be a danger of limiting the rich possibilities of simply 'thinking'. The writings of Heidegger (1889-1976) are cited, highlighting the need to 'call' thinking, and to meditate or ponder on the things that matter. The paper comes from research that asked the question 'What calls for thinking in postgraduate education?' Findings reveal examples of teachers and students recalling 'thinking experiences' but also suggest there is a danger that students do not have time to think in a busy classroom situation. It appears that thinking is more likely to happen outside of the classroom, with peers, in assignment writing, or when thoughts simply come. The challenge to nursing education is that not only may teachers be limiting students thinking opportunities, but they may be directing thinking in a way that maintains the status quo. If nursing is to equip itself as a dynamic profession and take initiative for shaping its own future, then close attention must be paid to enabling thinking.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Elizabeth A Smythe. 2004. Thinking.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2004.02.008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The FOCIS international survey on psychiatrists' opinions on cognition in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this project was to develop an interview to evaluate psychiatrists' views on the nature of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia, its importance as a potential treatment target, and its relative importance as a treatment target across different phases of schizophrenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey (available in paper or on-line) consisting of 27 questions, was developed by the Focus on Cognition in Schizophrenia (FOCIS) group, and distributed in a single wave mailing to 63,295 psychiatrists in 21 countries worldwide. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 4.7% (n=2975). The surveyed psychiatrists perceived cognition as a high treatment priority in stabilized schizophrenia patients, but less so for first episode or acute schizophrenia patients. The potential of atypical antipsychotics to improve cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia was identified by 81% of the respondent psychiatrists. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive deficits in people with schizophrenia are seen by clinical psychiatrists as relevant to treatment and rehabilitation plans. They were, however, regarded as a higher treatment priority in stabilized chronic rather than in first episode patients. The results suggest clinical psychiatrists need additional education regarding the nature of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia and its importance for psychosocial rehabilitation and community re-entry.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Family physicians' information seeking behaviors: a survey comparison with other specialties.

BACKGROUND: Using technology to access clinical information has become a critical skill for family physicians. The aims of this study were to assess the way family physicians use the Internet to look for clinical information and how their patterns vary from those of specialists. Further, we sought a better understanding of how family physicians used just-in-time information in clinical practice. METHODS: A fax survey was provided with 17 items. The survey instrument, adapted from two previous studies, was sent to community-based physicians. The questions measured frequency of use and importance of the Internet, palm computers, Internet CME, and email for information seeking and CME. Barriers to use were explored. Demographic data was gathered concerning gender, years since medical school graduation, practice location, practice type, and practice specialty. RESULTS: Family physicians found the Internet to be useful and important as an information source. They were more likely to search for patient oriented material than were specialists who more often searched literature, journals and corresponded with colleagues. Hand held computers were used by almost half of family physicians. CONCLUSION: Family physicians consider the Internet important to the practice of medicine, and the majority use it regularly. Their searches differ from colleagues in other specialties with a focus on direct patient care questions. Almost half of family physicians use hand held computers, most often for drug reference.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗