Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15106893

Renal osteodystrophy.

Abstract

Patients with chronic renal failure suffer from four different kinds of typical bone lesions which are summarized as renal osteodystrophy (ROD). These changes can occur early during renal disease and are dependent on several factors, such as the calcium-phosphorus homeostasis, the type of renal disease or the frequency and dose of potentially harmful drugs administered. ROD usually gets worse as renal failure progresses, and during hemodialysis, and culminates, in the case of kidney transplantation, in the early post-transplant phase. Although the decrease of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the dose of immunosuppression administered subsequently permit a certain restitution of bone stability, ROD persists lifelong in the majority of cases and is associated with a high rate of bone fractures. However, the abnormalities of mineral metabolism that lead to ROD are not only confined to bone morphology but also predispose to vascular or soft tissue calcification. This might lead to severe tissue or coronary artery calcification. It is therefore not surprising that life expectancy on hemodialysis is correlated to the expression and form of ROD. The awareness and early diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy are therefore of great importance, in particular since a number of new treatment options have recently evolved. Previously-used phosphate binders, which contain either aluminium or calcium, might be replaced by non-absorbable drugs which bind phosphate through ion exchange. In addition, PTH production can be reduced efficiently by administration of recently developed calcimimetic agents that increase the sensitivity of calcium-sensing receptors in the parathyroid gland. In patients with high-turnover bone disease or after transplantation, bisphosphonates might prevent or restore bone loss.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Martin Haas. 2004. Renal osteodystrophy.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-004-0052-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗