Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15097255

The optic disc hemifield test.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an optic disc hemifield test comparing the superior half of the optic disc with the inferior disc half is useful for glaucoma diagnosis. METHODS: The clinical observational study included 1268 patients with primary or secondary open-angle glaucoma and 649 normal subjects. The glaucoma group was divided into 1118 patients with glaucomatous visual field defects ("perimetric glaucoma"), and 150 patients with optic nerve head changes and normal visual fields ("preperimetric glaucoma"). Color stereo optic disc photographs were morphometrically evaluated. The optic disc area was divided into four sectors: temporal horizontal (60 degrees), superotemporal (90 degrees), inferotemporal (90 degrees), and nasal (120 degrees). Area and width of the neuroretinal rim were measured, and the ratio of superotemporal-to-inferotemporal rim area, the ratio of superior (12 o'clock)-to-inferior (6 o'clock) rim width, the difference of inferotemporal minus superotemporal rim area, and the difference of inferior rim width minus superior rim width were calculated. RESULTS: For the differentiation between the normal group and the whole glaucoma group, and for the differentiation between the normal group and the preperimetric glaucoma group, respectively, areas under the ROC curves were significantly smaller for the parameters of the optic disc hemifield test (superior-to-inferior rim width ratio: 0.448 and 0.412, respectively; and superotemporal-to-inferotemporal rim area ratio: 0.395 and 0.434, respectively) than for any other rim parameter tested such as inferotemporal rim area (0.827 and 0.745, reps.), total rim area (0.814 and 0.741, respectively), and superotemporal rim area (0.781 and 0.705, respectively). DISCUSSION: An optic disc hemifield test with the parameters superior-to-inferior rim width ratio and superotemporal-to-inferotemporal rim area ratio is not markedly helpful for the morphometric diagnosis of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, either in the preperimetric stage or in the perimetric stage of the disease.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jost B Jonas, Wido M Budde, Peter Martus. 2004. The optic disc hemifield test.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200404000-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Automated detection of macular drusen using geometric background leveling and threshold selection.

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the most prevalent cause of visual loss in patients older than 60 years in the United States. Observation of drusen is the hallmark finding in the clinical evaluation of ARMD. OBJECTIVES: To segment and quantify drusen found in patients with ARMD using image analysis and to compare the efficacy of image analysis segmentation with that of stereoscopic manual grading of drusen. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University referral center.Patients Photographs were randomly selected from an available database of patients with known ARMD in the ongoing Columbia University Macular Genetics Study. All patients were white and older than 60 years. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty images from 17 patients were selected as representative of common manifestations of drusen. Image preprocessing included automated color balancing and, where necessary, manual segmentation of confounding lesions such as geographic atrophy (3 images). The operator then chose among 3 automated processing options suggested by predominant drusen type. Automated processing consisted of elimination of background variability by a mathematical model and subsequent histogram-based threshold selection. A retinal specialist using a graphic tablet while viewing stereo pairs constructed digital drusen drawings for each image. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity and specificity of drusen segmentation using the automated method with respect to manual stereoscopic drusen drawings were calculated on a rigorous pixel-by-pixel basis. RESULTS: The median sensitivity and specificity of automated segmentation were 70% and 81%, respectively. After preprocessing and option choice, reproducibility of automated drusen segmentation was necessarily 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Automated drusen segmentation can be reliably performed on digital fundus photographs and result in successful quantification of drusen in a more precise manner than is traditionally possible with manual stereoscopic grading of drusen. With only minor preprocessing requirements, this automated detection technique may dramatically improve our ability to monitor drusen in ARMD.

Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological↗