Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15094976

Laparoscopy for malignancy: current status.

P A Paraskeva·S Purkayastha·A Darzi
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The acceptance of laparoscopy for the management of oncologic disease has been slow because of initial fears regarding the effect of this new approach on the interaction between the patient and the tumor. Since the initial attempts at laparoscopic resection, experience and technology have improved in parallel, facilitating improvements in this area. Laparoscopic oncologic surgery has a role in the management of oncologic patients at all stages of disease. Good evidence exists that laparoscopy has become an invaluable staging tool in many upper gastrointestinal cancers as well as lymphomas. The specter of port-site recurrence has loomed over the use of a laparoscopic approach for curative resections. However, it is clear from many reported trials that the initial prevalence of port-site metastases was more a technical issue rather than a problem with laparoscopy. Current large, multicenter trials will report the true outcomes of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery and its comparison with open surgery. It does appear that laparoscopic cancer surgery is feasible, safe, and oncologically sound. We fully believe that laparoscopic cancer surgery will play an increasingly major role in the management of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Explore related subjects

Clinical Trials as TopicDigestive System NeoplasmsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyNeoplasm StagingJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A Paraskeva, S Purkayastha, A Darzi. 2004. Laparoscopy for malignancy: current status.. https://doi.org/10.1177/107155170401100106

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Estimation in flexible two stage designs.

Adaptive test designs for clinical trials allow for a wide range of data driven design adaptations using all information gathered until an interim analysis. The basic principle is to use a test statistics which is invariant with respect to the design adaptations under the null hypothesis. This allows for a control of the type I error rate for the primary hypothesis even for adaptations not specified a priori in the study protocol. Estimation is usually another important part of a clinical trial, however, is more difficult in adaptive designs. In this research paper we give an overview of point and interval estimates for flexible designs and compare methods for typical sample size rules. We also make some proposals for confidence intervals which have nominal coverage probability also after an unforeseen design adaptation and which contain the maximum likelihood estimate and the usual unadjusted confidence interval.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2006

Power analyses for correlations from clustered study designs.

Power analysis constitutes an important component of modern clinical trials and research studies. Although a variety of methods and software packages are available, almost all of them are focused on regression models, with little attention paid to correlation analysis. However, the latter is arguably a simpler and more appropriate approach for modelling concurrent events, especially in psychosocial research. In this paper, we discuss power and sample size estimation for correlation analysis arising from clustered study designs. Our approach is based on the asymptotic distribution of correlated Pearson-type estimates. Although this asymptotic distribution is easy to use in data analysis, the presence of a large number of parameters creates a major problem for power analysis due to the lack of real data to estimate them. By introducing a surrogacy-type assumption, we show that all nuisance parameters can be eliminated, making it possible to perform power analysis based only on the parameters of interest. Simulation results suggest that power and sample size estimates obtained under the proposed approach are robust to this assumption.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2006

The sequential analysis of repeated binary responses: a score test for the case of three time points.

In this paper a robust method is developed for the analysis of data consisting of repeated binary observations taken at up to three fixed time points on each subject. The primary objective is to compare outcomes at the last time point, using earlier observations to predict this for subjects with incomplete records. A score test is derived. The method is developed for application to sequential clinical trials, as at interim analyses there will be many incomplete records occurring in non-informative patterns. Motivation for the methodology comes from experience with clinical trials in stroke and head injury, and data from one such trial is used to illustrate the approach. Extensions to more than three time points and to allow for stratification are discussed.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗