PubMed · 14989291
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Gerry Williams, Craig Sasse. 2004. Management systems for workforce performance.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14989291/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
There is an urgent need for validated, feasible tools to assess doctors' performance. A peer-rating tool mapped to good medical practice (SPRAT) is feasible, valid and reliable. SPRAT is ideal for revalidation purposes and performs particularly well in areas that are traditionally difficult to assess. It can also inform personal development planning.
This study found mixed support for the hypothesis that the difference in criterion-related validity between unstructured and structured employment interviews is due solely to the greater reliability of structured interviews. Using data from prior meta-analyses, this hypothesis was tested in 4 data sets by using standard psychometric procedures to remove the effects of measurement error in interview scores from correlations with rated job performance and training performance. In the 1st data set. support was found for this hypothesis. However, in a 2nd data set structured interviews had higher true score correlations with performance ratings, and in 2 other data sets unstructured interviews had higher true score correlations. We also found that averaging across 3 to 4 independent unstructured interviews provides the same level of validity for predicting job performance as a structured interview administered by a single interviewer. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.