Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14975110

Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models.

Abstract

Methods to handle missing data have been an area of statistical research for many years. Little has been done within the context of pedigree analysis. In this paper we present two methods for imputing missing data for polygenic models using family data. The imputation schemes take into account familial relationships and use the observed familial information for the imputation. A traditional multiple imputation approach and multiple imputation or data augmentation approach within a Gibbs sampler for the handling of missing data for a polygenic model are presented.We used both the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated missing phenotype and the complete phenotype data sets as the means to illustrate the two methods. We looked at the phenotypic trait systolic blood pressure and the covariate gender at time point 11 (1970) for Cohort 1 and time point 1 (1971) for Cohort 2. Comparing the results for three replicates of complete and missing data incorporating multiple imputation, we find that multiple imputation via a Gibbs sampler produces more accurate results. Thus, we recommend the Gibbs sampler for imputation purposes because of the ease with which it can be extended to more complicated models, the consistency of the results, and the accountability of the variation due to imputation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brooke Fridley, Kari Rabe, Mariza de Andrade. 2003-12-31. Imputation methods for missing data for polygenic models.. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-4-s1-s42

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Parental longevity and 7-year changes in blood pressures in adult offspring.

In this report, we examined the cross-sectional and the 7-year longitudinal changes in blood pressures in adult offspring according to parental longevity. A population of volunteers free of symptomatic cardiovascular diseases who participated to the Supplementation en Vitamines et en Minéraux Antioxydants (SUVIMAX) Vascular Study (mean age 52.3 years; 48.3% women) were examined at baseline and 7 years later. Paternal (n=994) and maternal (n=896) longevity were analyzed separately. The prevalence of hypertension at baseline in subjects whose father died at <65 years of age, in those whose fathers were alive by age 65 but died by 80 years of age, and in those whose fathers were alive by age 80 was respectively 34.9%, 28.5%, and 20.2% (P<0.001). The means of systolic blood pressure in the 3 groups of paternal longevity were respectively 128.4 (+/-16.0), 125.3 (+/-14.2), and 123.6 (+/-14.4) mm Hg (P<0.001). During the follow-up, the mean systolic blood pressure increases in the 3 groups of paternal longevity were respectively 5.3 (+/-17.0), 4.2 (+/-14.0), and 1.6 (+/-13.2) mm Hg (P<0.001). In subjects without hypertension at baseline, hypertension occurred during the follow-up in 26.6%, 17.7%, and 15.3% (P<0.009), respectively. Multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline or changes in cardiovascular risk factors did not modify these results. In contrast, there was no relationship between maternal longevity and blood pressure measurements in either cross-sectional or longitudinal analyses. This study suggests that paternal premature death was associated with accelerated progression of systolic blood pressure and higher occurrence of hypertension in offspring. These results indicate that there are dynamic and continuous processes linking paternal longevity to blood pressure in adults.

Adult Children↗

The family perspective of ESRD deaths.

BACKGROUND: Nephrologists need to become more aware of how patients die. METHODS: Families of patients who died after receiving dialysis at 5 New England nephrology clinics were contacted and informed about the study. Postal questionnaires were completed 6 to 10 weeks after deaths to elicit the family members' perspectives. The tool inquired about quality of dying, site of death, advance care preferences, whether dialysis was discontinued, and terminal symptoms. RESULTS: There were 188 deaths, and 86 completed questionnaires (46%) were returned. The majority (64%) of family members believed that the patient had a peaceful death, followed by those who were unsure (24%), and those who thought the death was not peaceful (12%). Most deaths took place in institutional settings (56% in the hospital and 14% in nursing homes), and one quarter (27%) of the deaths occurred at home. Whereas some respondents perceived that patients preferred treatment to primarily extend life (28%), more believed that relieving pain (49%) was of greater importance, and the balance (24%) were unsure. Three quarters of the patient population were observed to be in pain during their last week of life. Pain was assessed as being extremely or moderately severe in more than 90% of patients. The second most distressing symptom was weakness or fatigue, followed by dyspnea, gastrointestinal problems, anxiety, and depression. There was significantly less likelihood of pain in the last week of life for patients who died at home compared with those who died in an institution. CONCLUSION: Nephrologists need to explore new ways to improve symptomatic treatment and minimize suffering of dying dialysis patients. These findings are the first step in benchmarking the prevalence and severity of terminal symptoms.

Adult Children↗

Lucidity in a woman with severe dementia related to conversation. a case study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the presence of lucidity in a woman with severe dementia during conversations and whether it occurred when conversational partners or the woman with severe dementia initiated the conversation topics about the present, past or future time and whether she was presented with support or demands during the conversation. BACKGROUND: Communication problems as well as episodes of lucidity in people with dementia are reported in the literature. DESIGN: A researcher held 20 hours of conversation with a woman with severe dementia. A daughter participated for about three and a half hours. The conversation was tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. METHODS: The text was divided into units of analysis. Each unit of analysis was then assessed separately and discussed among the authors. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis were performed. An ethics committee approved the study. RESULTS: The woman as initiator of the conversation topic and support to the women during conversation from the conversation partner were found to be the most significant factors explaining lucidity, while conversation about the present or past time showed no connection with lucidity. Very few topics (n = 7) concerned future time and they were not used in the statistical analysis. The researcher initiated 41%, the woman 43% and the daughter 16% of the topics. Support was registered in 49%, demands in 15% and both support and demands in 16% of the units of analysis. There were 58% topics about present and 40% about the past time. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study is a case study and the results cannot be generalized. For the woman with severe dementia, lucidity was promoted by the conversational parties carefully focusing on conversation topics initiated by the woman while supporting her during conversation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: To share the same perception of reality, focusing on the topics initiated by the patient with severe dementia and a supporting attitude to what the patient tells, will hopefully give more episodes of lucidity in the patient. This approach in caring for patients with severe dementia might give more meaning and well-being to the conversational partners in daily care.

Adult Children↗