PubMed · 14971239
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Roger Taylor. 2004-02-05. Delayed discharge.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14971239/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement serves as the primary fixation material between bone and the prosthetic component in cemented total hip arthroplasty. In vivo degradation of bone cement may lead to a decrease in mechanical properties of PMMA and result in aseptic loosening. However, other factors such as porosity and location of the cement relative to the bone implant interface may also contribute to mechanical behavior in vivo. This study investigated the mechanical properties of Simplex cement retrieved from 43 patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. The time in vivo was between 1 month and 27 years. The variables studied included fracture toughness (KIC), porosity, molecular weight, time in vivo of the cement, and relative in vivo location of the cement with respect to the implant and bone. KIC did not correlate with time in vivo of the samples or with molecular weight. This suggests that time in vivo may not be the limiting factor in the mechanical integrity of the bone cement, A significant and inverse relationship was found between porosity and KIC. This implies that porosity is the most important factor in the mechanical behavior of bone cement during in vivo use.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether behavioural and systemic measures will decrease intra-operative contamination during total hip or knee replacements. The influence of these measures on subsequent prolonged wound discharge, superficial surgical site infection and deep periprosthetic infection was also investigated during an 18-month follow-up period. Four swabs were taken from instruments at the beginning and end of the procedure for 207 procedures. Removed bone material (acetabulum and femur in case of the hip joint; femur and tibia in case of the knee joint) was also tested for contamination. Initially, 70 operations performed under original control conditions were included, after which the first behavioural measure was introduced (i.e. better use of the plenum). Cultures were taken during 67 operations using better use of the plenum (Group 1), followed by disciplinary measures and the installation of a new laminar flow system. Seventy operations were monitored after this second intervention (Group 2). The control group showed intra-operative contamination in 32.9% (23/70) of cases, Group 1 showed contamination in 34.3% (23/67) of cases and Group 2 showed contamination in 8.6% (6/70) of cases. Prolonged wound discharge and superficial surgical site infection decreased significantly in Group 2, as did the incidence of deep periprosthetic infection; however, the latter did not reach statistical significance. This study shows that the combination of systemic and behavioural changes in an operating room significantly decreases the incidence of intra-operative bacterial contamination, subsequent prolonged wound discharge and superficial surgical site infection. After 18 months of follow-up, there was also a decrease in deep periprosthetic infection.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to determine the precision of the preparation of the femoral cavity in cementless hip arthroplasty. We compared the bone-prosthesis interface after manual- and robot-assisted implantation of the stems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After plastination the specimens were cut to slices of 2.5 mm and documented by microradiography. The interface between prosthesis and bone was measured digitally with a specially designed software. RESULTS: The manually implanted prostheses showed an average full-contact area of 60% and an average area of gaps of 40% with an average height of 0.8 mm. The robot-assisted implanted stems had a significantly higher bone-prosthesis interface area of 93% and gap areas of less than 0.2 mm depth. Destructions of the spongeous bone were seen with the manually implanted stems but not after robot-assisted implantations. There was one stem fracture during the manual preparation of a stem. Microradiographic examination showed microfractures in the region of the lesser trochanter in two femora after robot-assisted implantation CONCLUSION: The robot-assisted technique highly increased the fitting area at the bone-prosthesis interface. The main reason for the fractures might be the absence of a robot done marker for the ideal implantation height with the applied type of prosthesis.