PubMed · 14914299
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F L WEILLE. 1952. Speech audiometry in practical use.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1952.00710010468009
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Speech recognition measurements are widely used in clinical applications. Usually, either a speech recognition threshold is determined, being defined as the speech level or signal-to-noise ratio that enables the patient to understand 50% of the target words or target sentences. In other cases, a discrimination curve, describing speech recognition as function of the presentation level, is recorded. For the interpretation of these findings, it is important to keep in mind that speech perception is affected by many interacting sensory, perceptual and cognitive processes.Here, our current knowledge of these processes is outlined and theories that model speech perception in general are briefly reviewed.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term speech perception and speech intelligibility of congenitally and prelingually deaf children after cochlear implantation. It was a longitudinal study following 63 congenitally or prelingually deaf children up to 5 years after implantation. They each received a nucleus multichannel cochlear implant before they were 10 years old. METHODS: Perception is evaluated using the Test for the Evaluation of Voice Perception and Production (TEPP) and concerns closed- and open-set word and sentence perception without lip-reading. The intelligibility is classified according to the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR). The evaluations have been made every 3 months for 1 year, then at 18 months, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years after the cochlear implantation. RESULTS: After 5 years of implantation, the median percentage of closed-words speech perception (CSW) is 95.5%-93.67% for closed-sentence speech perception (CSS) and 76.3% for open-sentence speech perception (OSS); the median Speech Intelligibility Rating is 3.83. CONCLUSIONS: Congenitally and prelingually deaf children who receive cochlear implant before the age of 10 years develop speech perception and speech intelligibility abilities. The closed-set perception progresses quickly and seems to reaching a plateau at 5 years post implantation. The improvement of open-sentence perception is not significant until the first year post implantation. The speech intelligibility improves regularly the five first year post implantation.
OBJECTIVES: To prove that cochlear implantation is a beneficial method of rehabilitation in deaf children with malformations of the inner ear. DESIGN: The evaluation of auditory responses to speech (EARS) test battery was performed on the children in this study after an average implant use of 3 years. RESULTS: Individual results of six children with inner ear anomalies receiving cochlear implants are presented in this study. Three of the patients showed an incomplete partition (Mondini dysplasia), one had a cochlear hypoplasia and two suffered from an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. The majority of the children in this study are successful implant users. Wherever possible, test scores are included and subjective case reports given. CONCLUSIONS: Results are similar to those in children with normal cochleas, therefore inner ear malformations found in as many as 20% of patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss are no contraindication for cochlear implantation. Nevertheless, factors influencing the success of implantation are multiple, including a thorough preoperative radiological examination, a well-performed surgery and an individually tailored postoperative rehabilitation programme.