PubMed · 14912779
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R FROMENT. 1951-12-11. [Angina pectoris; basic clinical data].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14912779/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We present a 55 year old man that was admitted to our Institution because of anginal chest pain. Transthoracic echocardiogram was normal. Coronary angiography showed three vessels disease and an anomalous circumflex artery arising from right proximal coronary artery. By-pass surgery was successfully performed.
BACKGROUND: Commonly used methods to evaluate heart rate variability require extensive filtering of the registrations in order to exclude artefacts and ectopic beats. We developed and validated a novel graphical method for time-domain measurements of heart rate variability, the differential index, which does not require filtering and is simple to use. METHODS: The 24-h ambulatory long-term electrocardiogram recordings from 120 patients with angina pectoris and 49 control subjects were computerised without any filtering process. Sample density histograms of differences in the RR interval for successive beats were constructed and the widths of the histograms were used to obtain the differential index. For comparison, the same registrations were analysed by conventional methods. RESULTS: The differential index was most closely related (P<0.001) to conventional short-term time domain (e.g. percent of differences between adjacent normal RR intervals >50 ms, pNN50, r=0.81) and frequency-domain (e.g. high frequency power, r=0.84) components, but also to long-term time domain (e.g. standard deviation of all normal-to-normal RR intervals for all 5-min segments of the entire registration, SDNNIDX, r=0.72) and frequency-domain (e.g. low frequency power, r=0.64) components. CONCLUSION: The differential index method shows good agreement with established indices of heart rate variability. The insensitivity to recording artefacts and short-lasting disturbances of sinus rhythm make the differential index method particularly suited when data quality is imperfect. The simplicity of the method is valuable when large numbers of registrations are to be evaluated.
Several lines of evidence indicate that increased inflammatory activity in peripheral blood is associated with the acute coronary syndrome. Systemic inflammation in clinically stable conditions of coronary artery disease has been less studied. We examined cytokine profiles in 20 patients who had acute coronary syndrome, 45 who had angiographically verified coronary artery disease and stable angina pectoris, and 45 healthy controls. Circulating levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, interleukin-2 receptor, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and interleukin-18 were determined. Subpopulations of peripheral immune cells, including neutrophil-platelet aggregates, were analyzed by 3-color flow cytometry using a panel of monoclonal antibodies. Patients who had acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris had significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist than did controls, whereas levels of interleukin-2 receptor, interleukin-10, and interleukin-18 were similar across groups. Patients had significantly more neutrophils, and the numbers of neutrophil-platelet aggregates were particularly large in patients who had stable angina pectoris. High levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in patients were significantly related to numbers of neutrophils and neutrophil-platelet aggregates but not to other immune cell subpopulations. The data suggest that the interaction between neutrophils and platelets is an important component of proinflammatory activity seen in peripheral blood of stable and unstable forms of coronary artery disease.