PubMed · 14883068
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B PRUSAK. 1951-10-05. [Biliary examination].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14883068/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This is the fifth in the series of short reviews of internet-based radiological learning resources and will focus on gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary radiology. Below are details of a few of the higher quality resources currently available. Most of the sites cater for medical students and trainee or non-specialist radiologists, but may be also be of interest to specialists, especially for use in teaching. Hyperlinks are available in the electronic version of this article and were all active at the time of going to press (May 2006).
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered the gold standard for imaging of the biliary tract but is associated with complications. Less invasive imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), have a much lower complication rate. The accuracy of MRCP is comparable to that of ERCP, and MRCP may be more effective and cost-effective, particularly in cases for which the suspected prevalence of disease is low and further intervention can be avoided. A model was constructed to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MRCP and ERCP in patients with a previous history of cholecystectomy, presenting with abdominal pain and/or abnormal liver function tests. METHODS: Diagnostic accuracy estimates came from a systematic review of MRCP. A decision analytic model was constructed to represent the diagnostic and treatment pathway of this patient group. The model compared the following two diagnostic strategies: (i) MRCP followed with ERCP if positive, and then management based on ERCP; and (ii) ERCP only. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses were used to assess the likelihood of MRCP being cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of prior probabilities of common bile duct stones (CBDS) and test performance characteristics. The outcomes considered were costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost per additional QALY. RESULTS: The deterministic analysis indicated that MRCP was dominant over ERCP. At prior probabilities of CBDS, less than 60 percent MRCP was the less costly initial diagnostic test; above this threshold, ERCP was less costly. Similarly, at probabilities of CBDS less than 68 percent, MRCP was also the more effective strategy (generated more QALYs). Above this threshold, ERCP became the more effective strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that, in this patient group for which there is a low to moderate probability of CBDS, there was a 59 percent likelihood that MRCP was cost-saving, an 83 percent chance that MRCP was more effective with a higher quality adjusted survival, and an 83 percent chance that MRCP had a cost-effectiveness ratio more favorable than dollars 50,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Costs and cost-effectiveness are dependent upon the prior probability of CBDS. However, probabilistic analysis indicated that, with a high degree of certainty, MRCP was the more effective and cost-effective initial test in postcholecystectomy patients with a low to moderate probability of CBDS.
Chronic acalculous gallbladder and chronic acalculous biliary disease are considered functional hepatobiliary diseases. Cholescintigraphy provides physiologic imaging of biliary drainage, making it ideally suited for their noninvasive diagnosis. For chronic acalculous gallbladder disease, calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction during sincalide cholescintigraphy can confirm the clinical diagnosis and has become a common routine procedure in many nuclear medicine clinics. Published data generally confirm a high overall accuracy for predicting relief of symptoms with cholecystectomy. However, data also exist suggesting it is not useful. The discrepant results probably are caused by the various different methodologies that have been used for sincalide infusion. Proper methodology of sincalide infusion is critical for providing accurate reproducible results, minimizing false positive studies, and preventing adverse side effects. The most common causes for the postcholecystectomy pain syndrome are partial biliary obstruction secondary to stones or tumor and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The latter is a partial biliary obstruction at the level of the sphincter. This has long been considered a functional hepatobiliary disease because of the lack of anatomical abnormalities. Sphincterotomy is the present treatment; however, diagnosis requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincter of Oddi manometry, which has a high complication rate and is not widely available. The unique ability of cholescintigraphy to image biliary drainage allows noninvasive diagnosis. Different methodologies have been reported, many with good overall accuracy. Various pharmacologic interventions and quantitative methodologies have been used in conjunction with cholescintigraphy to enhance its diagnostic capability. Further investigations are needed determine the optimal methodology; however, cholescintigraphic methods have already a clinical role in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and will be used increasingly in the future.