PubMed · 1488080
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P Jacobs, L Wood. 1992. The sobering perspective.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1488080/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
High incidences of graft failure and graft-versus-host disease in the recipients of bone marrow transplantations (BMT) from unrelated donors (URD) may reflect the existence of allelic disparities between the patient and the URD despite apparent HLA identity at HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 loci. To identify the extent and pattern of allelic disparities at HLA-A and HLA-B loci, 128 patients and 484 potential URD were evaluated by DNA typing. DNA typing for HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 was performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. HLA-A and HLA-B serotyping on URD was provided by the registries. By original typing (serology for HLA-A and HLA-B; DNA typing for DRB1) 187, 164, and 133 URD were 6/6, 5/6, and 4/6 matches, respectively. Following DNA typing, however, only 52.9% of the originally 6/6 matched URD remained 6/6, while 38.5%, 7.5%, and 1.1% were found to be 5/6, 4/6, and 3/6 matches. The level of disparity was higher in the originally 5/6 (P <.01) and 4/6 (P <.01) matched URD. A higher level of disparity was seen for HLA-B as compared to HLA-A. In addition, a serotype related variation was also noticed. For example, 24.1% of HLA-A2 and 60.1% of HLA-B35 seromatched URD were genotypically disparate, but no disparities were seen for HLA-A1 and HLA-B8. A higher percentage of HLA-A (67. 4%) compared with HLA-B (35.4%) serologic homozygous URD remained genotypically homozygous (P =.01). The level of allelic disparity was lower (P <.01 for 6/6; P =.02 for 5/6) if the patient had one of the 15 most common haplotypes (A1B8DR3, A2B7DR15, A3B7DR15, etc) in comparison to the rest of the group. Outcome studies will answer the question whether these disparities are associated with a higher rate of immunological complications seen with URD-BMT.
Biologic agents have made a major impact on the treatment of hematologic malignancies and will continue to play a major role as we better understand their function in normal and malignant cell regulation. The examples provided in this chapter are a brief introduction to the potential of these agents. Many have yet to be used in conjunction with current cytotoxic therapy in these diseases, and perhaps combinations will prove even more successful. This possibility provides substantial ground for further investigation and therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.