PubMed · 14875556
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J SZMYT. 1951-06-11. [Glare].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14875556/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Repetitive eye movement produces a compelling motion aftereffect (MAE). One mechanism thought to contribute to the illusory movement is an extra-retinal motion signal generated after adaptation. However, extra-retinal signals are also generated during pursuit. They modulate activity within cortical motion-processing area MST, helping transform retinal motion into motion in the world during an eye movement. Given the evidence that MST plays a key role in generating MAE, it may also become indirectly adapted by prolonged pursuit. To differentiate between these two extra-retinal mechanisms we examined storage of the MAE across a period of darkness. In one condition observers were told to stare at a moving pattern, an instruction that induces a more reflexive type of eye movement. In another they were told to deliberately pursue it. We found equally long MAEs when testing immediately after adaptation but not when the test was delayed by 40 s. In the case of the reflexive eye movement the delay almost completely extinguished the MAE, whereas the illusory motion following pursuit remained intact. This suggests pursuit adapts cortical motion-processing areas whereas unintentional eye movement does not. A second experiment showed that cortical mechanisms cannot be the sole determinant of pursuit-induced MAE. Following oblique pursuit, we found MAE direction changes from oblique to vertical. Perceived MAE direction appears to be influenced by a subcortical mechanism as well, one based on the relative recovery rate of horizontal and vertical eye-movement processes recruited during oblique pursuit.
The purpose of this study was to compare the a-waves of mGluR6-deficient mice (KO) to that of wild-type mice (WT), and to determine whether the light-adapted electroretinogram of the KO mice originate exclusively from cones. Dark-adapted a-waves were recorded under the same conditions from both types of mice. With a 96-cd/m(2) background, the a-wave from both types of mice showed a rapid recovery over a 50-min period. The analysis of the a-waves in KO mice indicated that the recovery was determined mainly by the rod component. The light-adapted b-wave of WT mice showed no corresponding recovery. We conclude that rod contribution must be considered in the analyses of the light-adapted a-waves of KO mice.
The visual evoked potential (VEP) in the mouse is characterized and compared to responses obtained with the electroretinogram (ERG). The results indicate that: 1, the VEP originates in the visual cortex; 2, the rod and cone pathways contribute separately to the VEP; 3, temporal tuning functions for rod and cone ERGs are low pass and band pass, respectively; VEP tuning functions are both band pass; and 4, VEP acuity is 0.62+/-0.156 cycles/degree. The differences in the spatial and temporal tuning functions obtained from the retina and visual cortex provides a tool to investigate signal processing through the visual system.