PubMed · 14793941
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1950. [Statistics].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14793941/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This article gives an overview of sample size calculations for parallel group and cross-over studies with Normal data. Sample size derivation is given for trials where the objective is to demonstrate: superiority, equivalence, non-inferiority, bioequivalence and estimation to a given precision, for different types I and II errors. It is demonstrated how the different trial objectives influence the null and alternative hypotheses of the trials and how these hypotheses influence the calculations. Sample size tables for the different types of trials and worked examples are given.
The same target luminance in different contexts can elicit markedly different perceptions of brightness, a fact that has long puzzled vision scientists. Here we test the proposal that the visual system encodes not luminance as such but rather the statistical relationship of a particular luminance to all possible luminance values experienced in natural contexts during evolution. This statistical conception of vision was validated by using a database of natural scenes in which we could determine the probability distribution functions of co-occurring target and contextual luminance values. The distribution functions obtained in this way predict target brightness in response to a variety of challenging stimuli, thus explaining these otherwise puzzling percepts. That brightness is determined by the statistics of natural light patterns implies that the relevant neural circuitry is specifically organized to generate these probabilistic responses.
Drop-out is a prevalent complication in the analysis of data from longitudinal studies, and remains an active area of research for statisticians and other quantitative methodologists. This tutorial is designed to synthesize and illustrate the broad array of techniques that are used to address outcome-related drop-out, with emphasis on regression-based methods. We begin with a review of important assumptions underlying likelihood-based and semi-parametric models, followed by an overview of models and methods used to draw inferences from incomplete longitudinal data. The majority of the tutorial is devoted to detailed analysis of two studies with substantial rates of drop-out, designed to illustrate the use of effective methods that are relatively easy to apply: in the first example, we use both semi-parametric and fully parametric models to analyse repeated binary responses from a clinical trial of smoking cessation interventions; in the second, pattern mixture models are used to analyse longitudinal CD4 counts from an observational cohort study of HIV-infected women. In each example, we describe exploratory analyses, model formulation, estimation methodology and interpretation of results. Analyses of incomplete data requires making unverifiable assumptions, and these are discussed in detail within the context of each application. Relevant SAS code is provided.