Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14735843

[Regression methods and causal inference: structural equations models].

Abstract

The estimate of correlations among observed outcomes is crucial in biomedical research, especially when the aim of the study is to infer, from the magnitude of these correlations, the causal influence of certain, sometimes latent, factors. In such situations, a typical regression approach, known as "structural equation models" (SEM), which was introduced in the 1970s, becomes significant. These models allow hypotheses to be formulated quite clearly, thanks to some explicit and rigorous graphical representations, on which the "path analysis" is based. SEM, which were initially used in economics, have in the past decade been applied in a wide variety of fields, especially in genetic epidemiology. It's in this field that SEM are extraordinarily effective, representing a simple yet powerful means of estimating the contribution of genes and the environment to the phenotypic expression of a given disease. To this end, data on twins are particularly useful, and in this case the correlation between the outcomes describes the extent of similarity of the twin phenotypes. From this standpoint, SEM undoubtedly constitute one of the most promising statistical tools for family studies and quantitative genetic research. The method can be easily extended to traditional epidemiology, and some interesting applications have already been developed in occupational and social epidemiology. In this paper, we describe in detail the SEM approach and discuss the use of these models in genetic epidemiology, using twin studies as an example. We also discuss the application of SEM in fields other than genetic research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Corrado Fagnani, Rodolfo Cotichini, M Antonietta Stazi. [Regression methods and causal inference: structural equations models].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14735843/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The causal relationship between multiple cardiovascular diseases and glioblastoma: A Mendelian randomization study.

Observational studies suggest an association between glioblastoma (GBM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), but a causal relationship remains unestablished. This study aimed to investigate the causal link between multiple CVDs and GBM risk. The inverse variance weighted method indicated that all 18 CVDs had significant causal associations with GBM (P&#x2005;<&#x2005;.05). Genetically predicted CVDs were uniformly associated with a lower risk of GBM (odds ratio&#x2005;<&#x2005;1), identifying them as potential protective factors. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the absence of significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, and the MR-Steiger test validated the correct causal direction. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study provides evidence that a range of CVDs are causally associated with a decreased risk of developing GBM. These findings suggest shared biological pathways and offer new insights for understanding GBM etiology. We conducted a 2-sample MR analysis using publicly available genome-wide association study data. GBM was the outcome, and 18 cardiovascular-related traits (including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and venous thromboembolism) were exposures. Instrumental variables were single-nucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with exposures (P&#x2005;<&#x2005;5&#x2005;&#xd7;&#x2005;10-8). The primary analysis used the inverse variance weighted method, supplemented with MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods. Sensitivity analyses, including Cochran Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, leave-one-out analysis, and MR-Steiger directionality test, were performed to ensure robustness.

Causality↗

Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation.

Even if the focus on risk management is increasing in our society, major accidents resulting in several fatalities seem to be unavoidable in some industries. Since the consequences of such major accidents are unacceptable, a thorough investigation of the accidents should be performed in order to learn from what has happened, and prevent future accidents. During the last decades, a number of methods for accident investigation have been developed. Each of these methods has different areas of application and different qualities and deficiencies. A combination of several methods ought to be used in a comprehensive investigation of a complex accident. This paper gives a brief description of a selection of some important, recognised, and commonly used methods for investigation of accidents. Further, the selected methods are compared according to important characteristics.

Causality↗