Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14718676

New developments in levodopa therapy.

Peter A LeWitt·Dag Nyholm
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

More than 30 years after its development, levodopa is still the most effective treatment for the symptomatic control of Parkinson's disease (PD). Although a number of therapies have been developed in an attempt to improve PD management, such as dopaminergic agonists and inhibitors of COMT and MAO-B, most patients still depend on levodopa alone because of its superior ability to control PD symptoms. The issue of toxicity has been raised by in vitro studies suggesting that levodopa might be toxic to dopaminergic neurons, but this has since been answered by in vivo studies finding no evidence of toxicity and possibly even neurotrophic-like effects. A more pressing concern regarding levodopa is its association with the development of motor complications after long-term use. Pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation as a result of erratic absorption and the short half-life of levodopa have been central issues in attempts to explain this occurrence. Evidence suggests that altering the delivery of levodopa to provide a more continuous supply of this drug to the brain may result in improved control of PD symptoms.

Explore related subjects

Drug Administration ScheduleDyskinesia, Drug-InducedHumansLevodopaParkinson DiseasePulse Therapy, DrugJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter A LeWitt, Dag Nyholm. 2004-01-13. New developments in levodopa therapy.. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.62.1_suppl_1.s9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

The pharmacology of antiretroviral nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors: implications for once-daily dosing.

The trend toward once-daily dosing in HIV antiretroviral therapy is based on the association between adherence, treatment outcome, and patient preferences. Patients prefer simpler treatments, fewer pills, less frequent dosing, and no food restrictions. When a regimen meets a patient's preferences, the patient is more likely to be adherent, and with good adherence, the regimen is more likely to be effective. Nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) have been a prime focus for developing once-daily therapies primarily because they form the backbone of most current regimens. Within the NRTI class, however, drugs differ in their pharmacokinetic properties, such as plasma and intracellular half-lives, and thus in their suitability for once-daily dosing. For example, newer NRTIs, such as tenofovir and emtricitabine, combine longer plasma half-lives with longer intracellular half-lives, prolonging exposure and the period of pharmacologic activity. Of equal importance, the clinical impact of systemic and intracellular interactions between concomitant drugs defines which once-daily drugs may be combined in once-daily regimens. To construct simplified and effective therapies for individual patients, clinicians require an understanding of the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetic properties of NRTIs and how these properties determine a drug's appropriateness for once-daily dosing and placement within a once-daily regimen.

Drug Administration Schedule↗
PubMed2005

Systematic review: the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

AIM: To perform a systematic review on the efficacy of intermittent and on-demand therapy with either histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors for patients with erosive oesophagitis or symptomatic heartburn. METHOD: We conducted randomized-controlled trials of non-continuous therapy in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Because of variation in outcome measures statistical pooling of results was not possible. Results were analysed qualitatively. Four studies evaluated intermittent therapy of treatment 3 days a week with omeprazole 20 mg or daily with ranitidine which were not efficacious compared to a daily proton pump inhibitor. Famotidine 10 and 20 mg, ranitidine 75 mg and cimetidine 200 mg were efficacious in five on-demand studies for relief of symptomatic heartburn episodes. In three of four studies, evaluating only non-erosive (endoscopy-negative) gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg and omeprazole 10 and 20 mg a day were efficacious using willingness to continue as an endpoint. Lansoprazole 30 mg and omeprazole 20 mg maintained symptom control in 60-70% of healed oesophagitis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist therapy is not effective in maintaining control in oesophagitis patients. H2-receptor antagonists are effective for relief of heartburn episodes. On-demand proton pump inhibitor therapy may work in a proportion of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Drug Administration Schedule↗