Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14689087

[Hypophyseal coma].

Abstract

Pituitary coma is a rare case of emergency and primarily due to ACTH and TSH deficiency. Pituitary coma occurs more often in patients with well-known pituitary deficiency than in patients with intrasellar tumor. Clinical manifestations are hypotonia, bradycardia, decreased skin and nipple pigmentation, muscle weakness, vomitus, nausea, obstipation, hypothermia, and hypoventilation. A postpartal agalactia is often the first sign of Sheehan's syndrome. Unlike primary adrenal insufficiency (Addison's disease) ACTH deficiency does not cause hyperpigmentation, hyperkalemia, or salt loss. The suspicion of pituitary coma requires replacement with 100 mg hydrocortisone iv, 200 mg hydrocortisone iv/24 h, 500 micro g levothyroxine iv and fluid substitution. Since thyroxine accelerates the degradation of cortisol and can precipitate adrenal crisis in patients with limited pituitary reserve, hydrocortisone replacement should always precede levothyroxine therapy. ACTH stimulation test, CRH stimulation test and insulin tolerance test (optional) should be performed after therapeutic compensation to determine pituitary function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B L Herrmann, K Mann. 2003. [Hypophyseal coma].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-003-1047-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A randomized-controlled trial of prophylactic hydrocortisone supplementation for the prevention of hypotension in extremely low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants are at risk for hypotension. Abnormal adrenal function may play a role in the pathogenesis of hypotension, and therefore, the administration of hydrocortisone (HC) may be an effective treatment for hypotension in some infants. However, the efficacy of prophylactic HC to prevent the use of vasopressors for a defined hypotensive state has not been studied. We conducted a randomized-controlled trial to determine the potential role on adrenal insufficiency in early neonatal hypotension and to determine the effectiveness of prophylactic HC in reducing treatment of hypotension in ELBW infants. STUDY DESIGN: Infants were assigned to receive either HC or placebo within the first 3 hours of life. Therapy was continued for 5 days. The presence of hypotension was based on an operational definition and treatment with vasopressors (VP) was standardized based on an a priori protocol. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Of the HC group 25% received VP at 24 hours of age compared to 44% of the placebo group. On day of life 2, only 7% of the HC group received VP compared to 39% of the placebo group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatment with HC reduces the incidence of hypotension, defined by treatment with VP, among ELBW infants during the first 2 days of life. However, the mounting evidence that prophylactic administration of glucocorticoids in the first days of life is harmful to ELBW infants makes HC prophylaxis unwise until the efficacy of treatment relative to safety can be clearly established.

Adrenal Insufficiency↗

Meta-analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose.

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses demonstrated that high-dose glucocorticoids were not beneficial in sepsis. Recently, lower-dose glucocorticoids have been studied. PURPOSE: To compare recent trials of glucocorticoids for sepsis with previous glucocorticoid trials. DATA SOURCES: Systematic MEDLINE search for studies published between 1988 and 2003. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials of sepsis that examined the effects of glucocorticoids on survival or vasopressor requirements. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently collected data on patient and study characteristics, treatment interventions, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 5 included trials revealed a consistent and beneficial effect of glucocorticoids on survival (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.23, [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.50]; P = 0.036) and shock reversal (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.71 [CI, 1.29 to 2.26]; P < 0.001). These effects were the same regardless of adrenal function. In contrast, 8 trials published before 1989 demonstrated a survival disadvantage with steroid treatment (I2 = 14%; relative benefit, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.97]; P = 0.008). In comparison with the earlier trials, the more recent trials administered steroids later after patients met enrollment criteria (median, 23 hours vs. <2 hours; P = 0.02), for longer courses (6 days vs. 1 day; P = 0.01), and in lower total dosages (hydrocortisone equivalents, 1209 mg vs. 23 975 mg; P = 0.01) to patients with higher control group mortality rates (mean, 57% vs. 34%; P = 0.06) who were more likely to be vasopressor-dependent (100% vs. 65%; P = 0.03). The relationship between steroid dose and survival was linear, characterized by benefit at low doses and increasing harm at higher doses (P = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: We could not analyze time-related improvements in medical care and potential bias secondary to nonreporting of negative study results. CONCLUSIONS: Although short courses of high-dose glucocorticoids decreased survival during sepsis, a 5- to 7-day course of physiologic hydrocortisone doses with subsequent tapering increases survival rate and shock reversal in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock.

Adrenal Insufficiency↗