Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14688448

Classifying hepatitis B virus genotypes.

Abstract

In 1988, hepatitis B virus (HBV) was classified into four genotypes by a sequence divergence in the entire genome exceeding 8%, and designated by capital letters of the alphabet from A to D. There are seven genotypes of HBV (A-G) at present, and an eighth is on the horizon. They have an uneven geographical distribution, and only a few of them are prevalent in a given area of the world. Thus genotype A is frequent in northwest Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa, India and the North, Central and South America, B as well as C are common in Southeast Asia and Oceania, and D is prevalent in the Mediterranean area, Central Asia and South America. Genotype E is restricted to West Africa, and F is localized in Central and South America. The distribution of genotype G added to the alphabet list very recently has yet to be determined. Coinfection with HBV of distinct genotypes is not infrequent and found in about 10% of infected individuals, and is responsible for intertypic recombination of HBV genomes. The mutation for a stop codon in the precore region (G1896A) for aborting the translation of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) is prohibited in HBV genomes of genotype A, as well as some of genotypes C and F, because they possess C at position 1858 that makes a Watson-Crick pair with G at position 1896. Hence, seroconversion to antibody to HBeAg is forbidden or delayed in individuals who carry them. Evidence is accumulating as regards the influence of HBV genotypes on the progression of chronic hepatitis B and response to antiviral therapies. HBV isolates even of the same genotype can differ in virological and clinical characteristics, and therefore, the genotype needs to be classified further into subtypes, especially if they are clinically relevant.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuzo Miyakawa, Masashi Mizokami. 2003. Classifying hepatitis B virus genotypes.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074988

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗