Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14685369

[Viral hepatitis: update].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors present an update related to different types of viral hepatitis in infancy. The clinic-laboratorial and special outcome aspects are presented. METHODS: The most important articles about viral hepatitis were selected through Medline. The epidemiologic and clinical characteristics related to the subject are reported with emphasis on Brazilian data. RESULTS: This review analyzes the diseases caused by agents that have in common the viral origin and the hepatotropism, but the hepatitis are different particularly in those aspects related to outcome and prognosis. The B virus, for example, may be related to healthy asymptomatic carrier to acute hepatitis, chronic disease, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. To date the known viruses are six: A, B, C, D, E and G. CONCLUSIONS: Viral hepatitis is a disease caused by one of the 6 different hepatotropic viruses which originate a wide range of clinical presentations. The viral distribution in Brazil is irregular; in some regions the B virus is prevalent, in others it is rare. The viral infections are the most important and the most frequent causes of liver disease in Brazilian children. The present review is to update viral hepatitis in infancy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C T Ferreira, T R Silveira. [Viral hepatitis: update].. https://doi.org/10.2223/jped.563

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Why Danes are smug--a comparative study of life satisfaction in the EU].

Danes are by far the most content citizens in the EU. We test a number of (im)plausible hypotheses and find that the solid depth of Danish well-being is multifactorial, but with two decisive factors: winning the 1992 European Championship in football and having constantly low (and undoubtedly realistic) expectations for the coming year. With an undoubtedly disappointing 2007 in store, we do not wish to foster false hopes. However, some tepid comfort might perhaps be taken from the fact that if you lower your expectations enough, you might feel a bit better next New Year.

English Abstract↗

[The anatomy lesson of Dr Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632) and the findings during dissection of the forearm of a cadaver: anatomical discrepancies].

OBJECTIVE: To compare The anatomy lesson of Dr Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632) with the findings during dissection of the forearm of a cadaver. DESIGN: Descriptive. METHOD: The left forearm of a 41-year-old white male cadaver was dissected, photographs being taken at every stage of dissection. The anatomical structures in the original painting and during dissection were described and compared. At dissection, several structures were displaced in an attempt to reproduce the anatomical structures as shown in the painting. RESULTS: Dissection revealed four anatomical differences in comparison with Rembrandt's painting: (a) the muscle belly seen at the proximal ulnar side of the forearm in the painting was not seen on dissection; section of the insertion of the M. flexor carpi radialis and transposition of this muscle to the location of the muscle belly created the possibility of lifting up the M. flexor digitorum superficialis and reproducing the muscle belly; (b) in the painting, Tulp lifted only the M. flexor digitorum superficialis, but the amount of muscle tissue found in the forceps was increased in the painting compared with the dissection; (c) the positions of the bellies of the M. flexor digitorum superficialis to the index finger and 5th digit and to the 3rd and 4th digits were found to be reversed; (d) the longitudinal white structure situated in the ulnar part of the 5th digit in the painting was not found on dissection. This may have been an anatomical variant of the ulnar nerve. CONCLUSION: The anatomical characteristics of the painting could not be reproduced by dissection of the forearm of a cadaver.

English Abstract↗

[Developing COPD--25 years follow-up study of the general population].

Smokers are more prone to developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than non-smokers. This knowledge comes from studies spanning 10 years or less. We used data from The Copenhagen City Heart Study to determine the 25-year absolute risk of developing COPD in healthy individuals. The 25-year incidence of moderate and severe COPD was 20.7% and 3.6%, respectively. Smoking cessation, especially early in the course of the follow-up, decreased the risk substantially. The absolute risk of developing COPD among smokers is at least 25%, which is higher than previously anticipated.

English Abstract↗