PubMed · 14677413
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Joachim Liepert. 2003. TMS in stroke.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14677413/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
To address the extent to which functional connectivity measures an absolute brain state, we observed the effect of prior performance of a language task on resting-state networks in regions associated with language. Six subjects were imaged during rest before and after a block-design language task. Connectivity maps were generated for each of four language regions (identified from analysis of the language activation portion of the study) in each subject for both rest periods. Conjunction analysis demonstrated distinct networks of voxels for each seed region, indicating separate functional subnetworks associated with the different regions. In a comparison of rest before and after the activation task widespread and significant changes were observed in all individuals, suggesting that the measured resting state network reflects a dynamic image of the current brain state. At the group level, an extended network was observed that was largely persistent over time. Even at the group level an increase in connectivity was observed between left and right middle frontal gyri, and between posterior cingulate cortex and medial frontal cortex in the rest after the language task. These results suggest that functional connectivity may be a powerful measure of cognitive state, sensitive to differences between controls and patients together with the particular cognitive processing occurring during the rest state.
Behavioral evidence suggests that human adults have a single system for representing the numerical magnitude of both symbolic numbers (e.g., Arabic digits) and nonsymbolic number stimuli (e.g., dot arrays). Brain imaging studies have implicated a specific parietal region in symbolic number processing, leading to the influential hypothesis that this region is the locus of a dedicated, domain-specific number system. Here we evaluated a prediction of this hypothesis, that this region should be activated not only by symbolic but also nonsymbolic number processing. Using nonsymbolic stimuli, we tested for higher parietal activations for number than for nonnumber comparison tasks (experiment 1), fMRI adaptation for numerosity repetition (experiment 2), and greater fMRI increases with increasing task difficulty for number than nonnumber tasks (experiment 3). None of these predictions were supported by the data, posing a serious challenge to the hypothesis that a single, domain-specific parietal region underlies both symbolic and nonsymbolic number representation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.