Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14649752

An air quality data analysis system for interrelating effects, standards, and needed source reductions: Part 13--Applying the EPA Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment to a set of asbestos lung cancer mortality data.

Ralph I Larsen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA-90) list 189 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) for which "safe" ambient concentrations are to be determined. The primary purpose of this paper is to develop two mathematical models, lognormal and logarithmic, that effectively express excess lung cancer mortality as a function of asbestos concentration for an example set of data and also to suggest using these two models for additional HAPs. The secondary purpose of this paper is to calculate a "safe" asbestos concentration by first assuming a default linear extrapolation (to one excess death per million people, as specified for carcinogenic HAPs). The resulting "safe" concentration is an impossible-to-achieve 1/1000 of present background asbestos concentrations. A letter to the editor and a response in this Journal issue use additional asbestos data that suggest that the "safe" concentration should be about 730 times higher than first calculated here and that a default nonlinear extrapolation should be used instead, with the "safe" concentration proportional to the desired mortality level raised to the 0.39 power. These results suggest that the most important problem in setting a "safe" concentration for each carcinogenic HAP is to determine the correct nonlinear extrapolation to use for each HAP.

Explore related subjects

AsbestosEnvironmentEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionGuidelines as TopicHumansLung NeoplasmsModels, TheoreticalPublic HealthRisk AssessmentSafetyUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ralph I Larsen. 2003. An air quality data analysis system for interrelating effects, standards, and needed source reductions: Part 13--Applying the EPA Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment to a set of asbestos lung cancer mortality data.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2003.10466308

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Assessing the combined effect of asbestos exposure and smoking on lung cancer: a Bayesian approach.

We review the literature on the combined association between lung cancer and two environmental exposures, asbestos exposure and smoking, and explore a Bayesian approach to assess evidence of interaction between the exposures. The meta-analysis combines separate indices of additive and multiplicative relationships and multivariate relative risk estimates. By making inferences on posterior probabilities we can explore both the form and strength of interaction. This analysis may be more informative than providing evidence to support one relation over another on the basis of statistical significance. Overall, we find evidence for a more than additive and less than multiplicative relation.

Asbestos↗
PubMed2007

Comparison of validity of assessment methods using indices of adjusted agreement.

For comparing the validity of rating methods, the adjusted kappa (S coefficient) and Yule's Y index are better than Cohen's kappa which is affected by marginal probabilities. We consider a validity study in which a subject is assessed as exposed or not-exposed by two competing rating methods and the gold standard. We are interested in one of the methods, which is closer in agreement with the gold standard. We present statistical methods taking correlations into account for comparing the validity of the rating methods using S coefficient and Y index. We show how the S coefficient and Yule's Y index are related to sensitivity and specificity. In comparing the two rating methods, the preference is clear when the inference is the same for both S and Y. If the inference using S differs from that using Y, then it is not obvious how to decide a preference. This may occur when one rating method is better than the other in sensitivity but not in specificity. Numerical examples for comparing asbestos-exposure assessment methods are illustrated.

Asbestos↗
PubMed2007

Analysis of news of the Japanese asbestos panic: a supposedly resolved issue that turned out to be a time bomb.

BACKGROUND: Asbestos-linked public health problems were widely reported in Japan, in 2005. The objective is to apply text mining with network analysis to characterize these problems. METHODS: Text mining with network analysis of newspaper headlines including the word 'asbestos' published in 1987 and 2005 was conducted. Outcome measures are occurrence of the words and simultaneous occurrence of two words in the newspaper headlines. RESULTS: In 36 headlines, which contained the word 'asbestos' in 1987, the word 'pollution' (40%) appeared most frequently, followed by 'removal' (31%) and 'campaign' (29%). For combinations of words, the following occurred most frequently: 'campaign and expulsion' (26%) followed by 'removal and campaign' (14%). Of 293 headlines in 2005, the following words appeared: 'hazard' (31%), 'person' (16%) and 'death' (13%). For combinations, the following appeared: 'person and death' (9%). Asbestos pollution and removal campaigns were reported in 1987, but the death of citizens was reported in 2005. CONCLUSIONS: Text mining with network analysis, which presents one of the methods for visualization of text data, suggests the following insight. Insufficient steps against asbestos had been taken for 20 years, which is compatible with the latency period. It has resulted in widespread exposure to asbestos and more severe asbestos-related public health problems among citizens. This methodology suggests that analyzing text data by this method can serve future surveillance and efficient use of epidemiological knowledge.

Asbestos↗