Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models.

Ronghui Xu

doi:10.1002/sim.1572

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14601017

Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models.

Ronghui Xu

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We generalize the well-known R(2) measure for linear regression to linear mixed effects models. Our work was motivated by a cluster-randomized study conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, to compare two different versions of informed consent document. We quantify the variation in the response that is explained by the covariates under the linear mixed model, and study three types of measures to estimate such quantities. The first type of measures make direct use of the estimated variances; the second type of measures use residual sums of squares in analogy to the linear regression; the third type of measures are based on the Kullback-Leibler information gain. All the measures can be easily obtained from software programs that fit linear mixed models. We study the performance of the measures through Monte Carlo simulations, and illustrate the usefulness of the measures on data sets.

Explore related subjects

Antipsychotic Agents Bayes Theorem Cluster Analysis Computer Simulation Consent Forms Humans Linear Models Monte Carlo Method Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Schizophrenia Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ronghui Xu. 2003-11-30. Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs.

The treatment of schizophrenia has evolved over the past half century primarily in the context of antipsychotic drug development. Although there has been significant progress resulting in the availability and use of numerous medications, these reflect three basic classes of medications (conventional (typical), atypical and dopamine partial agonist antipsychotics) all of which, despite working by varying mechanisms of actions, act principally on dopamine systems. Many of the second-generation (atypical and dopamine partial agonist) antipsychotics are believed to offer advantages over first-generation agents in the treatment for schizophrenia. However, the pharmacological properties that confer the different therapeutic effects of the new generation of antipsychotic drugs have remained elusive, and certain side effects can still impact patient health and quality of life. Moreover, the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs is limited prompting the clinical use of adjunctive pharmacy to augment the effects of treatment. In addition, the search for novel and nondopaminergic antipsychotic drugs has not been successful to date, though numerous development strategies continue to be pursued, guided by various pathophysiologic hypotheses. This article provides a brief review and critique of the current therapeutic armamentarium for treating schizophrenia and drug development strategies and theories of mechanisms of action of antipsychotics, and focuses on novel targets for therapeutic agents for future drug development.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed2004

The effects of antipsychotic therapy on serum lipids: a comprehensive review.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to review the literature since 1970 documenting the effects of antipsychotic agents on serum lipids, including a discussion of possible mechanisms for the observed phenomena, the clinical significance and recommendations for monitoring hyperlipidemia during antipsychotic therapy. RESULTS: High-potency conventional antipsychotics (e.g., haloperidol) and the atypical antipsychotics, ziprasidone, risperidone and aripiprazole, appear to be associated with lower risk of hyperlipidemia. Low-potency conventional antipsychotics (e.g., chlorpormazine, thioridazine) and the atypical antipsychotics, quetiapine, olanzapine and clozapine, are associated with higher risk of hyperlipidemia. Possible hypotheses for lipid dysregulation include weight gain, dietary changes and the development of glucose intolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Given the multiple cardiovascular risk factors seen in patients with schizophrenia, great care must be exercised in the choice of antipsychotic therapy to minimize the medical burden of additional risk imposed by hyperlipidemia. It is recommended that a lipid panel be obtained at baseline in all patients with schizophrenia, annually thereafter for patients on agents associated with lower risk of hyperlipidemia and quarterly in patients on agents associated with higher risk for hyperlipidemia. All patients with persistent dyslipidemia should be referred for lipid-lowering therapy or switched to a less lipid-offending antipsychotic agent.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed2004

Covariate adjustment in clinical trials with non-ignorable missing data and non-compliance.

Estimating causal effects in psychiatric clinical trials is often complicated by treatment non-compliance and missing outcomes. While new estimators have recently been proposed to address these problems, they do not allow for inclusion of continuous covariates. We propose estimators that adjust for continuous covariates in addition to non-compliance and missing data. Using simulations, we compare mean squared errors for the new estimators with those of previously established estimators. We then illustrate our findings in a study examining the efficacy of clozapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. For data with continuous or binary outcomes in the presence of non-compliance, non-ignorable missing data, and a covariate effect, the new estimators generally performed better than the previously established estimators. In the clozapine trial, the new estimators gave point and interval estimates similar to established estimators. We recommend the new estimators as they are unbiased even when outcomes are not missing at random and they are more efficient than established estimators in the presence of covariate effects under the widest variety of circumstances.

Antipsychotic Agents↗