Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1459395

General practitioners' attitudes towards future developments in practice computing--a representative survey in the north of Germany.

Abstract

A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of general practitioners in Lower Saxony, Germany to assess how general practitioners regard newly developed but not yet implemented options of practice computers and future applications such as expert systems and information retrieval systems. Replies were received from 276 (response rate 73.6%) general practitioners. Replying doctors were younger (P < 0.05) but they did not differ by sex, practice location, type of vocational training and grade of computerization from non-responding GPs. Twenty-eight per cent of the practices were computerized. Doctors who currently used a computer and those who intended to do so within the next 5 years were significantly younger than those doctors who did not intend to computerize their practice (P < 0.001). Female doctors were less willing to buy a computer than their male colleagues (P < 0.05). A computerized drug database and a medical library ranked best from 8 options given. Overall attitudes to all features were positive, except for an expert system giving criteria for referrals to specialist care. Doctors already working with a computer and those intending to buy one were significantly more positive about future options for computers than those doctors who do not intend to use a computer (P < 0.01). GPs' attitudes about new features of practice computers in general were positive but even more so about those options which are already available. Referral to a specialist seems to be a crucial point for GPs--they apparently do not want to be guided by a computer here.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Szecsenyi, A Buschhorn, M M Kochen. 1992. General practitioners' attitudes towards future developments in practice computing--a representative survey in the north of Germany.. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra%2F9.3.357

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

MMR vaccination advice over the Internet.

We wanted to investigate what advice UK homeopaths, chiropractors and general practitioners give on measles, mumps and rubella vaccination programme (MMR) vaccination via the Internet. Online referral directories listing e-mail addresses of UK homeopaths, chiropractors and general practitioners and private websites were visited. All addresses thus located received a letter of a (fictitious) patient asking for advice about the MMR vaccination. After sending a follow-up letter explaining the nature and aim of this project and offering the option of withdrawal, 26% of all respondents withdrew their answers. Homeopaths yielded a final response rate (53%, n = 77) compared to chiropractors (32%, n = 16). GPs unanimously refused to give advice over the Internet. No homeopath and only one chiropractor advised in favour of the MMR vaccination. Two homeopaths and three chiropractors indirectly advised in favour of MMR. More chiropractors than homeopaths displayed a positive attitude towards the MMR vaccination. Some complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers have a negative attitude towards immunisation and means of changing this should be considered.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Attitudes of health care workers towards waking a terminally ill patient in the intensive care unit for treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether health care workers would wake an intubated patient whose preferences are not known, and whether attitudes are influenced by how health care workers themselves would like to be treated if they were in the patient's place. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of 90 participants at a postgraduate lecture to anesthesiologists and related professions. Participants filled out questionnaires after a case presentation followed by two commentaries, one arguing against, the other for waking a 49-year-old intubated patient suffering from a large, intratracheal, poorly differentiated metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the lungs. The patient was not aware of the diagnosis and poor prognosis and had not expressed any preferences. RESULTS: Participants were almost equally divided between the two alternatives. Significant differences were found between professions concerning the willingness not to wake the patient (19.8% of nurses vs. 45% of physicians and others). There was a strong correlation between the preferences of the health care worker for her-/himself and what he/she would do if in charge of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that attitudes of health care workers towards waking and informing an intubated patient in the intensive care unit about a hopeless situation differ. Educational programs should ensure that physicians and nurses, especially when discussing and deciding withdrawal of vital support, are aware of theses differences and realize that their own behavior can be influenced by their own preferences if themselves in the patient's situation.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗