PubMed · 14405449
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A R HUNTER. 1960. [Halothane].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14405449/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Withdrawal (detoxification) is necessary prior to drug-free treatment. It may also represent the end point of long-term opioid replacement treatment such as methadone maintenance. The availability of managed withdrawal is essential to an effective treatment system. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of interventions involving the administration of opioid antagonists to induce opioid withdrawal with concomitant heavy sedation or anaesthesia, in terms of withdrawal signs and symptoms, completion of treatment and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Drugs and Alcohol Group register (October 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2004), Medline (January 1966 to January 2005), Embase (January 1985 to January 2005), PsycINFO (1967 to January 2005), and Cinahl (1982 to December 2004) and reference lists of studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials comparing antagonist-induced withdrawal under heavy sedation or anaesthesia with another form of treatment, or a different regime of anaesthesia-based antagonist-induced withdrawal. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer assessed studies for inclusion and undertook data extraction and assessed quality. Inclusion decisions and the overall process were confirmed by consultation between all three reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies (five randomised controlled trials) involving 834 participants met the inclusion criteria for the review.Antagonist-induced withdrawal is more intense but less prolonged than withdrawal managed with reducing doses of methadone, and doses of naltrexone sufficient for blockade of opioid effects can be established significantly more quickly with antagonist-induced withdrawal than withdrawal managed with clonidine and symptomatic medications. The level of sedation does not affect the intensity and duration of withdrawal, although the duration of anaesthesia may influence withdrawal severity. There is a significantly greater risk of adverse events with heavy, compared to light, sedation (RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.13 to 9.12, P = 0.03) and probably also other forms of detoxification. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Heavy sedation compared to light sedation does not confer additional benefits in terms of less severe withdrawal or increased rates of commencement on naltrexone maintenance treatment. Given that the adverse events are potentially life-threatening, the value of antagonist-induced withdrawal under heavy sedation or anaesthesia is not supported. The high cost of anaesthesia-based approaches, both in monetary terms and use of scarce intensive care resources, suggest that this form of treatment should not be pursued.
To study acute tolerance, rats were anesthetized with interrupted i.v. allopregnanolone infusions where the "silent second" in the electroencephalogram (EEG) was the target. Animals were killed either directly at the first silent second or at the silent second level after 30 or 90 min of anaesthesia. Acute tolerance was demonstrated at 90 min of anaesthesia as earlier shown. In situ hybridization showed a decreased expression of the gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor subunit alpha4mRNA amount in the thalamus ventral-posteriomedial nucleus of the tolerant rats. A parallel change in the abundance of the alpha4 subunit was detected with immunohistochemistry. The increase in maintenance dose rate (MDR) was significantly negatively correlated with the alpha4mRNA in the thalamus ventral-posteriomedial nucleus, and positively correlated with alpha2mRNA in different hippocampal subregions. There was also a positive relationship between the alpha1mRNA amounts in the different hippocampal subregions, with significant differences between groups. These changes in GABA(A) receptor subunits mRNA expression and protein (alpha4) might be of importance for the development of acute tolerance to allopregnanolone.
In this work molecular modeling was applied to generate homology models of the pore region of the Na(v)1.2 and Na(v)1.8 isoforms of human voltage-gated sodium channels. The models represent the channels in the resting, open, and fast-inactivated states. The transmembrane portions of the channels were based on the equivalent domains of the closed and open conformation potassium channels KcsA and MthK, respectively. The critical selectivity loops were modeled using a structural template identified by a novel 3D-search technique and subsequently merged with the transmembrane portions. The resulting draft models were used to study the differences of tetrodotoxin binding to the tetrodotoxin-sensitive Na(v)1.2 (EC50: 0.012 microM) and -insensitive Na(v)1.8 (EC50: 60 microM) isoforms, respectively. Furthermore, we investigated binding of the local anesthetic tetracaine to Na(v)1.8 (EC50: 12.5 microM) in resting, conducting, and fast-inactivated state. In accordance with experimental mutagenesis studies, computational docking of tetrodotoxin and tetracaine provided (1) a description of site 1 toxin and local anesthetic binding sites in voltage-gated sodium channels. (2) A rationale for site 1 toxin-sensitivity versus -insensitivity in atomic detail involving interactions of the Na(v)1.2 residues F385-I and W943-II. (3) A working hypothesis of interactions between Na(v)1.8 in different conformational states and the local anesthetic tetracaine.