Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1437506

Immunomodulators. Future prospects.

Abstract

The future role of the immunomodulators in medical practice is yet to be defined. The key question is whether these new substances will bring remarkable progress in transplantation or in the treatment of such conditions as cancer, AIDS, and autoimmune diseases, or whether they will be of only minor adjunctive importance. As background to the discussion of immunomodulating agents, the immune system is explained, with emphasis on the roles of T and B lymphocytes, macrophages, phagocytes, human leukocyte antigen and the complement system. Special attention is given to the cytokines, particularly the lymphokines. The immunomodulators can be divided into three main groups: immunosuppressive agents, such as FK 506 and rapamycin; immunostimulating agents, of which BCG vaccine is most important; and the remaining immunomodulators, which include the biological response modifiers. The last group, which encompasses the colony-stimulating factors (GM-CSF, G-CSF, and M-CSF), the interleukins, the interferons, and the tumour necrosis factors, is described in detail. Innovative research and medical applications of these cytokines, including indications, contraindications, and adverse reactions, are discussed. The role of monoclonal antibodies against endotoxins is also described.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B C Takx-Köhlen. 1992-08-21. Immunomodulators. Future prospects.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01962546

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a split and a subunit-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in elderly subjects.

A randomised, open study was carried out among an elderly population in order to compare the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an inactivated, split virion influenza vaccine (Vaxigrip, Aventis Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France) with that of an MF59-adjuvanted, subunit vaccine (Fluad, Chiron Vaccines, Siena, Italy). Both vaccines contained the three strains: A/Sydney/5/97 (H3N2), A/Beijing/262/95 (H1N1) and B/Beijing/184/93, recommended by the WHO for the 1998-1999 influenza season. A total of 2150 subjects were vaccinated and included in the reactogenicity analysis. A total of 1076 subjects received Vaxigrip (age 73.3 +/- 5.9 years, 49.6% men) and 1074 subjects received Fluad (age 73.4 +/- 5.9 years, 52.3% men). All subjects were kept under medical observation for 30 min after vaccination, in order to check any immediate local and/or systemic reaction. A self monitoring diary card was given to all subjects to collect any local and/or systemic reaction occurring during the 3 days following the vaccination, any adverse event occurring between vaccination day and 21st day post-vaccination and any medication taken during the study period. A total of 1186 subjects were included in the immunogenicity analysis. A total of 591 subjects received Vaxigrip (age 73.4 +/- 5.6 years, 52.3% men) and 595 subjects received Fluad (age 73.8 +/- 5.9 years, 55.8% men). Blood samples were collected pre- and 21 days post-vaccination and were analysed by the haemagglutination inhibition assay. In terms of reactogenicity both vaccines were generally well tolerated. The frequency of local reactions was lower in the group that received Vaxigrip. Pain at the injection site occurring from 30 min to 3 days after vaccination was also significantly less frequent (P = 0.005) in the Vaxigrip group. Fever > or =37.5 degrees C was reported in less than 1% of all vaccinated subjects. No serious adverse event was related to vaccine administration. In terms of immunogenicity both vaccines induced an effective immune response (anti-HI titre > or =40) against A/Sydney/5/97 (H3N2) and A/Beijing/262/95 (H1N1) strains in the entire population. Vaxigrip and Fluad induced similar seroprotection and seroconversion rates against the A/Sydney/5/97 (H3N2) strain. For both vaccines a lower percentage of subjects achieved a seroprotective titre > or =40 against the B/Beijing/184/93. A lower antibody response against the influenza B strain was also observed in other studies conducted during the same season. In subjects 75 years of age or older, Fluad was more immunogenic than Vaxigrip for all three virus strains.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Ginseng and aluminium hydroxide act synergistically as vaccine adjuvants.

The dry extract prepared from the Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer-root (total ginseng (T-ginseng)) contain ginsenosides (G-des) which were shown to have adjuvant properties as demonstrated by: (a) injecting guinea pigs with a mixture of T-ginseng and inactivated porcine parvovirus (PPV) as a conventional vaccine; (b)injecting PPV-antigen and T-ginseng simultaneously but separately at different sites on the animal and (c)injecting only the T-ginseng 1 or 2 weeks prior to immunisation with the PPV-antigen. Using a haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test in the antibody titration, it was found that the mean HI-titre for the animals injected with PPV-antigen only was 320 +/- 0. By comparison, the mean titre value was 2026 +/- 1206 for the sera from the animals injected with the same vaccine but adjuvanted with 4 mg of T-ginseng, while the antibody titre induced by a vaccine containing Al(OH)(3)-gel was 2986 +/- 1596. Interestingly, the T-ginseng and Al(OH)(3) acted synergistically and further improved the antibody response to the PPV-antigen to 6826 +/- 2413, i.e. more than 20 times the HI titre of the non-adjuvanted PPV-vaccine. Immunisations using PPV-vaccines adjuvanted with single purified G-des demonstrated that the ginseng fractions Rb1 and Rg1 are potent adjuvants inducing higher or similar antibody titres than the vaccine adjuvanted with Al(OH)(3), e.g. Rb1 tested at a concentration of 830 microg per dose induced a significantly (P = 0.009) higher antibody titre than the one adjuvanted with Al(OH)(3). Nevertheless, different than the mixture Al(OH)(3)-T-ginseng; Rb1 and Rg1 act antagonistically and partially inhibit each other. The G-des adjuvanted vaccines induced significantly (P = 0.0011) higher titres of IgG2 antibodies compared with IgG1.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Encapsulation of peptides in biodegradable microspheres prolongs their MHC class-I presentation by dendritic cells and macrophages in vitro.

Biodegradable microspheres (MS) consisting of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) represent a promising alternative to conventional adjuvants. The adjustable pulsatile release of encapsulated material from such MS offers the potential to mimic the priming and boosting injections of conventional immunization regimens. In this paper, we demonstrate that MS can serve as antigen reservoirs in antigen presenting cells (APC), so that antigen is presented for extended periods of time (up to 9 days). In particular, we could show by measurement of IFN-gamma production that encapsulated peptides were presented to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) by mouse and human macrophages as well as by human dendritic cells in vitro for a longer time period as compared to soluble peptides. The extended antigen presentation may thus improve the CTL response in vivo. These results may be of paramount importance in cancer vaccination therapy since MS may serve as antigen reservoirs to extend the presentation time by APC used to boost the patient's immune response to tumor antigens.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗