PubMed · 14373659
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R E STEEN, S J DOUGLAS. 1955. Double aortic arch.. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.10.1.37
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Bullet embolism is a well known but a relatively rare phenomenon in common medicolegal autopsy practice. We present a homicide case of a bullet embolism to the left popliteal artery with interesting trajectory of projectile through the chest wall and right heart ventricle into the aortic lumen. Since in our presented case obvious homicidal manner of death was in question, discovery of bullet was an obligatory part of investigation in order to positively identify the responsible firearm. Detection of the missile transported through the circulation requires very thorough autopsy examination, especially if X-ray equipment is not available. As in all other cases in which initial bullet trajectory is changed in the body, the very important part of the medicolegal autopsy in cases accompanied with missile embolism, is to determine direction of the first part of the bullet's trajectory, because this indicates the position of the axis of the weapon barrel in the moment of firing (if there was no external ricochet), taking into consideration the posture of the victim and the location of the shooting person in the same moment. A review of the tangible literature is given.
Systemic embolism is a frequent cause of stroke. At the beginning of the last decade by introduction of transesophageal echocardiography and other imaging techniques atheromatosis of the aortic arch has been recognized as an important source of embolism. Formerly in the pre-TEE era, this entity was included into cryptogenic strokes. Aortic atheromas are found in about one quarter of patients presenting with embolic events. The severity of atherosclerosis graded by TEE correlates with the risk for future embolism, especially if mobile lesions or superimposed thrombi are present. Independent of plaque extension, patients with unstable plaques characterized by echo-lucency, inhomogenity, lacking of calcifications, ulceration, mobile parts and concomitant spontaneous echo contrast within the aorta have a higher risk for embolic events. However, the diagnosis of aortic atheromatosis is mostly established if an embolic event has already occurred. Therefore, it is important to identify patients at risk, especially before they undergo interventions with manipulation at the aorta like coronary bypass surgery. Risk factors are age above 70, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension, aortic calcifications on standard chest X-ray, elevated serum levels of C-reactive protein, other inflammatory markers, and an activated coagulation. Randomized studies for treatment of patients with severe aortic atheromatosis are not yet existing. Warfarin has been shown to prevent stroke in patients with mobile atheromas and superimposed thrombi, but there are case reports about aggravation of cholesterol embolism under warfarin treatment. It is concluded from other atherosclerotic manifestations that plaque stabilizing treatment with statins and ACE inhibitors is also beneficial.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate aortic function and its relation to left ventricular diastolic function in patients with hypertension, diabetes, or both, without coronary artery disease. METHODS: Study groups were composed of 27 healthy participants and 25 patients with hypertension, 24 with diabetes, and 18 with hypertension and diabetes. Coronary artery disease was excluded in all of the study participants. Aortic strain and distensibility were calculated from the aortic diameters measured by echocardiography and blood pressure obtained by sphygmomanometry. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the control and the patient groups (hypertensive, diabetic, and diabetic-hypertensive) in aortic strain (mean (SD) 18 (8)% v 11 (7)%, 9 (3)%, and 8 (3)%, respectively, p < 0.001) and distensibility (10 (5.1) v 3.1 (1.5), 5.1 (2.8), and 2 (0.9) cm2/dyn/10(3), respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the parameter most closely related to the deceleration time in the control group was aortic distensibility (standardised beta coefficient -0.50, p = 0.002, overall R2 = 0.25). In the patient group, the parameter most closely related to deceleration time was also aortic distensibility (standardised beta coefficient -0.36, p = 0.009, overall R2 = 0.13). Even though the study group variable was entered in to the multivariate model, aortic distensibility was found to be the parameter most closely related to deceleration time (standardised beta coefficient -0.48, p < 0.001, overall R2 = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Aortic stiffness is increased in patients with hypertension, diabetes, or both even after the exclusion of coronary artery disease. Aortic stiffness and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction are also associated in these patients.