Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14362993

TUBERCULOSIS control.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1955. TUBERCULOSIS control.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14362993/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Changes in the etiology of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients and the susceptibilities of the currently isolated pathogens.

The etiology of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients in the past few decades has shifted from gram-negative to gram-positive organisms. Potential reasons include the use of indwelling catheters, local environmental conditions, and the administration of specific antibiotic agents, especially as prophylaxis. Other factors may emerge from new studies, such as the categorization of febrile neutropenic patients into groups at low risk and at high risk of developing serious complications, continuing changes in resistance in the community, the use of antibiotic-coated catheters, and future changes in cytotoxic chemotherapy or antineoplastic therapy. In addition, there has been a drift in susceptibility patterns, with resistance issues seen in the general population of hospitalized patients now emerging in febrile neutropenic patients, as well as some issues specific to these patients. These changes affect empirical therapy as it was practiced a decade ago. Among the most commonly used agents, cefepime and carbapenems continue to show the highest rates of in vitro susceptibility, providing coverage against most gram-positive and gram-negative organisms and reducing the need for glycopeptides. Older agents continue to show degradation of their effectiveness. Among Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, susceptibility to all agents continues to decline.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in febrile neutropenia.

Antibiotics generally considered for antibacterial prophylaxis for immunosuppressed patients are trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and the quinolones. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole can significantly reduce infections and is highly effective in preventing pneumonia due to Pneumocystis carinii. However, it can cause sulfonamide-related reactions, myelosuppression, oral candidiasis, and development of bacterial resistance, and it lacks activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Quinolones can reduce the occurrence of fever and infections in patients with neutropenia but do not provide adequate coverage against gram-positive bacteria, and inappropriate use can induce resistance among gram-negative organisms. Routine antibacterial prophylaxis is not recommended for patients likely to develop neutropenia. Antifungal prophylaxis is appropriate in settings in which fungal infections are frequent. Fluconazole is recommended for patients who are to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; it can be considered for elderly patients with acute leukemia who are to receive intensive chemotherapy. Itraconazole can also be used. Prophylaxis with antiviral agents is generally not indicated; however, it should be given to hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

Prevention of laboratory-acquired brucellosis.

Brucellosis is one of the most common laboratory-acquired infections, mostly because aerosolization is a mechanism of transmission in this setting. We report an exposure to Brucella melitensis that occurred in a large microbiology laboratory and describe the strategy chosen for antibiotic prophylaxis and serological follow-up of exposed workers.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗