Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1431756

Temporal patterning in cascade juggling.

Abstract

A key variable in cascade juggling is the proportion of time that a juggler holds onto a juggled object during a hand cycle, that is, the time from catch to throw in relation to the time from catch to catch. Space-time constraints and principles of frequency locking suggest 3/4 as the primary ratio and 2/3 and 5/8 as the most accessible options. In 5 experiments, object number, mass, and type (ball or scarf) were manipulated together with the frequency at which the objects were juggled. With 5 or 7 balls, the ratio was 3/4, independent of frequency. With 3 balls, the ratio decreased with frequency, with 3/4, 2/3, and 5/8 tending to predominate independently of the force variations induced by variation in object mass. With 3 scarves, ratios varied inversely with frequency and often exceeded 3/4. Implications for a dynamical theory of juggling were discussed with the issue of relative timing in coordination and the manipulation of task constraints as an experimental strategy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Beek, M T Turvey. 1992. Temporal patterning in cascade juggling.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.18.4.934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How to limit clinical errors in interpretation of data.

We all assume that we can understand and correctly interpret what we read. However, interpretation is a collection of subtle processes that are easily influenced by poor presentation or wording of information. This article examines how evidence-based principles of information design can be applied to medical records to enhance clinical understanding and accuracy in interpretation of the detailed data that they contain.

Attention

Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution.

Covert attention, the selective processing of visual information at a given location in the absence of eye movements, improves performance in several tasks, such as visual search and detection of luminance and vernier targets. An important unsettled issue is whether this improvement is due to a reduction in noise (internal or external), a change in decisional criteria, or signal enhancement. Here we show that attention can affect performance by signal enhancement. For a texture segregation task in which performance is actually diminished when spatial resolution is too high, we observed that attention improved performance at peripheral locations where spatial resolution was too low, but impaired performance at central locations where spatial resolution was too high. The counterintuitive impairment of performance that we found at the central retinal locations appears to have only one possible explanation: attention enhances spatial resolution.

Attention