PubMed · 14280070
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L MLYNARCZYK. 1964. [CELIAC PLEXUS].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14280070/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Because of the increasing availability of tools for genetic manipulation, the mouse has become the most popular animal model for studying normal and abnormal cardiac development. However, despite the enormous advances in mouse genetics, which have led to the production of numerous mutants with cardiac abnormalities resembling those seen in human congenital heart disease, relatively little comparative work has been published to demonstrate the similarities and differences in the developmental cardiac anatomy in both species. In this review we discuss some aspects of the comparative anatomy, with emphasis on the atrial anatomy, the valvuloseptal complex, and ventricular myocardial development. From the data presented it can be concluded that, apart from the obvious differences in size, the mouse and human heart are anatomically remarkably similar throughout development. The partitioning of the cardiac chambers (septation) follows the same sequence of events, while also the maturation of the cardiac valves and myocardium is quite similar in both species. The major anatomical differences are seen in the venous pole of the heart. We conclude that, taking note of the few anatomical "variations," the use of the mouse as a model system for the human heart is warranted. Thus the analysis of mouse mutants with impaired septation will provide valuable information on cellular mechanisms involved in valvuloseptal morphogenesis (a process often disrupted in congenital heart disease), while the study of embryonic lethal mouse mutants that present with lack of compaction of ventricular trabeculae will ultimately provide clues on the etiology of this abnormality in humans.
This study investigates whether macaques and humans possess a common pattern of relative growth during the fetal period. The fetal samples consist of 16 male pigtailed macaques (mean age, 20.5 gestational weeks) and 17 humans (9 males and 8 females; mean age, 29.5 gestational weeks). For each individual, three-dimensional coordinates of 18 landmarks on the skull were collected from three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) reconstructed images and two-dimensional CT axial slices. Early and late groups were created from the human (early mean age, 24 weeks, N = 8; late mean age, 34 weeks, N = 9) and macaque samples (early mean age, 17.7 weeks, N = 7; late mean age, 23 weeks, N = 9). Inter- and intraspecific comparisons were made between the early and late groups. To determine if macaques and humans share a common fetal pattern of relative growth, human change in shape estimated from a comparison of early and late groups was compared to the pattern estimated between early and late macaque groups. Euclidean distance matrix analysis was used in all comparisons. Intraspecific comparisons indicate that the growing fetal skull displays the greatest amount of change along mediolateral dimensions. Changes during human growth are primarily localized to the basicranium and palate, while macaques experience localized change in the midface. Interspecific comparisons indicate that the two primate species do not share a common pattern of relative growth, and the macaque pattern is characterized by increased midfacial growth relative to humans. Our results suggest that morphological differences in the craniofacial skeleton of these species are in part established by differences in fetal growth patterns.
Many primates habitually feed on tree exudates such as gums and saps. Among these exudate feeders, Cebuella pygmaea, Callithrix spp., Phaner furcifer, and most likely Euoticus elegantulus elicit exudate flow by biting into trees with their anterior dentition. We define this behavior as gouging. Beyond the recent publication by Dumont ([1997] Am J Phys Anthropol 102:187-202), there have been few attempts to address whether any aspect of skull form in gouging primates relates to this specialized feeding behavior. However, many researchers have proposed that tree gouging results in larger bite force, larger internal skull loads, and larger jaw gapes in comparison to other chewing and biting behaviors. If true, then we might expect primate gougers to exhibit skull modifications that provide increased abilities to produce bite forces at the incisors, withstand loads in the skull, and/or generate large gapes for gouging. We develop 13 morphological predictions based on the expectation that gouging involves relatively large jaw forces and/or jaw gapes. We compare skull shapes for P. furcifer to five cheirogaleid taxa, E. elegantulus to six galagid species, and C. jacchus to two tamarin species, so as to assess whether gouging primates exhibit these predicted morphological shapes. Our results show little morphological evidence for increased force-production or load-resistance abilities in the skulls of these gouging primates. Conversely, these gougers tend to have skull shapes that are advantageous for creating large gapes. For example, all three gouging species have significantly lower condylar heights relative to the toothrow at a given mandibular length in comparison with closely related, nongouging taxa. Lowering the height of the condyle relative to the mandibular toothrow should reduce the stretching of the masseters and medial pterygoids during jaw opening, as well as position the mandibular incisors more anteriorly at wide jaw gapes. In other words, the lower incisors will follow a more vertical trajectory during both jaw opening and closing. We predict, based on these findings, that tree-gouging primates do not generate unusually large forces, but that they do use relatively large gapes during gouging. Of course, in vivo data on jaw forces and jaw gapes are required to reliably assess skull functions during gouging.