PubMed · 1427694
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L T Learnard, E Devereaux. 1992. A model for community practice.. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.43.9.869
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, few data currently are available regarding the tolerance to chemotherapy in older cancer patients. This prospective pilot study evaluated the changes in functional, mental, nutritional, and comorbid status, as well as the quality of life (QOL), in geriatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: Sixty patients age > or = 70 years who were undergoing cancer chemotherapy were recruited in a university-based comprehensive cancer center. Changes in physical function were measured by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), mental health changes were measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), comorbidity was measured by Charlson's index and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric, nutrition was measured by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment, and QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Changes were assessed at baseline and at the end of treatment (EOT). Grade 4 hematologic and Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicities were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (63%) completed both assessments. Older cancer patients demonstrated a significant decline in measurements of physical function after receiving chemotherapy, as indicated by changes in scores on the IADL (P = 0.04) and on the physical (P = 0.01) and functional (P = 0.03) subscales of the FACT-G. They also displayed worse scores on the GDS administered postchemotherapy (P < 0.01). Patients who experienced severe chemotoxicity had more significant declines in ECOG PS (P = 0.03), IADL (P = 0.03), and GDS (P = 0.04), and more gain in the social well-being subscale (P = 0.02) of the FACT-G, than those who did not experience severe chemotoxicity. However, changes in most scores were small in magnitude clinically. No significant change was found between baseline and EOT in nutrition, comorbidity, and other aspects of the FACT-G. CONCLUSIONS: Older cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy may experience toxicity but generally can tolerate it with limited impact on independence, comorbidity, and QOL levels. It is important to recognize and monitor these changes during geriatric oncology treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, predictors, and impact on outcome of epilepsy developing during the first year after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: The authors prospectively analyzed 247 of 431 patients with SAH treated over a period of 5 years who were alive with follow-up at 12 months. Epilepsy was defined as two or more unprovoked seizures after hospital discharge. RESULTS: New-onset epilepsy occurred in 7% (n = 17) of patients; an additional 4% (n = 10) had only one seizure after discharge. Independent predictors of epilepsy included subdural hematoma (OR 9.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 52.8) and cerebral infarction (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 11.3). Unlike those without seizures, patients who developed epilepsy failed to experience functional recovery on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between 3 and 12 months after SAH. At 12 months epilepsy was independently associated with severe disability (score >/= 3) on the mRS (OR 10.3, 95% CI 2.5 to 42.0), increased instrumental disability on the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.1 to 22.2), reduced quality of life on the Sickness Impact Profile (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.1 to 18.0), and increased state anxiety on the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory (OR 4.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 20.4). Epilepsy was not associated with cognitive impairment, depression, or subjective life satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Epilepsy occurred in 7% of patients with SAH, was predicted by subdural hematoma and cerebral infarction, and was associated with poor functional recovery and quality of life. Our findings indicate that focal pathology, rather than diffuse injury from hemorrhage, is the principal cause of epilepsy after SAH.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to validate the Spanish version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire used to measure the intensity of oncological pain and its impact on activities of daily living in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients with oncological pain were consecutively included in the study. These patients filled up the Spanish version of the BPI questionnaire (CBD) and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RCSL) during the inclusion visit and again after 3-5 days (patients with clinically stable oncological pain) or after one month (patients with unstable oncological pain). RESULTS: 126 patients were assessed; 85.1% of them had suffered some episode of irruptive pain 24 hours prior to their inclusion in the study. 86.5% of patients fully completed the questionnaire. The CBD showed mild to moderate correlations with the patients perception of pain severity and with the presence of tumor dissemination. The < > dimension of the RCSL displayed the highest correlation with the dimensions of the BPI (< > and < >). The internal consistency and the test-retest reliability between dimensions were good (0.87 and 0.89) and low to moderate (0.53 and 0.77), respectively. The CBD questionnaire was found to be a tool capable of detecting changes in pain intensity. The changes observed in the two CBD dimensions between study visits fairly reflected the patients perceived changes in pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of BPI is valid for measuring the intensity of oncological pain and its impact on activities of daily living in conditions of usual clinical practice.