Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 142308

[Worker morbidity in wool-processing enterprises].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L N Kurilova, E V Garas'ko. 1977. [Worker morbidity in wool-processing enterprises].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/142308/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The prevalence, patterns and impact of irritable bowel syndrome: an international survey of 40,000 subjects.

AIM: To determine the prevalence, symptom pattern and impact of the irritable bowel syndrome, across eight European countries, using a standardized methodology. METHODS: A community survey of 41 984 individuals was performed using quota sampling and random digit telephone dialing to identify those with diagnosed irritable bowel syndrome or those meeting diagnostic criteria, followed by in-depth interviews. RESULTS: The overall prevalence was 11.5% (6.2-12%); 9.6% had current symptoms, 4.8% had been formally diagnosed and a further 2.9%, 4.2% and 6.5% met the Rome II, Rome I or Manning criteria, respectively. Bowel habit classification varied by criteria: 63% had an 'alternating' bowel habit by Rome II vs. 21% by self-report. On average, 69% reported symptoms lasting for 1 h, twice daily, for 7 days a month. Irritable bowel syndrome sufferers reported more peptic ulcer (13% vs. 6%), reflux (21% vs. 7%) and appendectomy (17% vs. 11%), but not hysterectomy, cholecystectomy or bladder procedures. Ninety per cent had consulted in primary care and 17% in hospital; 69% had used medication. Irritable bowel syndrome substantially interfered with lifestyle and caused absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: Irritable bowel syndrome is common with major effects on lifestyle and health care. The majority of cases are undiagnosed and the prevalence varies strikingly between countries. Diagnostic criteria are associated with varying prevalences and bowel habit sub-types. This limits their utility in clinical practice and the transferability of research findings using them.

Absenteeism↗

The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory tract infection (VRTI) is the most common illness in humans. Despite the high incidence, the economic impact of non-influenza-related VRTI has not been rigorously explored. Our objectives were to obtain an updated incidence of non-influenza-related VRTI in the United States and to quantify the health care resource use (direct costs) and productivity losses (indirect costs) associated with these infections. METHODS: A nationwide telephone survey of US households (N = 4051) was conducted between November 3, 2000, and February 12, 2001 to obtain a representative estimate of the self-reported incidence of non-influenza-related VRTI and related treatment patterns. Direct treatment costs measured included outpatient clinician encounters, use of over-the-counter and prescription drugs, and associated infectious complications of non-influenza-related VRTI. Absenteeism estimates for infected individuals and parents of infected children were extrapolated from National Health Interview Survey data. RESULTS: Of survey respondents, 72% reported a non-influenza-related VRTI within the past year. Respondents who experienced a self-reported non-influenza-related VRTI averaged 2.5 episodes annually. When these rates are extrapolated to the entire US population, approximately 500 million non-influenza-related VRTI episodes occur per year. Similarly, if the treatment patterns reported by the respondents are extended to the population, the total economic impact of non-influenza-related VRTI approaches $40 billion annually (direct costs, $17 billion per year; and indirect costs, $22.5 billion per year). CONCLUSIONS: Largely because of the high attack rate, non-influenza-related VRTI imposes a greater economic burden than many other clinical conditions. The pending availability of effective antiviral therapies warrants increased attention be paid to this common and expensive illness.

Absenteeism↗

Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter?

BACKGROUND: Several studies report an earlier return to work after minimal invasive kidney donation compared to open donor nephrectomy. However, this variation in outcome might be influenced by other factors than the surgical technique used, such as the advice given by the physician regarding return to work. In this study, we compare the absence from work after open (ODN), laparoscopic (LDN), and hand-assisted donor nephrectomy (HA) performed in the Netherlands, in relation to the advice given. METHODS: Questionnaires containing questions about return to work or return to daily activities were sent to 78 donors from three hospitals. In the HA and ODN hospitals, advice on full return to work was 3 months. In contrast, advice given in the LDN hospital was 6 weeks. RESULTS: After LDN, donors resumed their work after 6 weeks, 5 weeks faster compared to ODN (p = 0.002) and HA (p <0.001). Complete return to work occurred 9 weeks sooner in the LDN group compared to the ODN and HA groups (both p <0.001). In the unemployed group, there was no significant difference in length until full return to daily activities. CONCLUSION: Return to work is influenced by the advice on return to work given by the physician as well as the morbidity associated with the surgical approach.

Absenteeism↗