PubMed · 14060309
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R L ROWAN, T F HOWLEY. PREMATURE EJACULATIONS.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)34928-7
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A total of 262 women in the USA (161 breast cancer survivors and 101 controls) were exposed to a video vignette using modeling in which a physician discussed the concept of a clinical trial (CT) with a woman who was in the process of making a treatment decision. A pretest-post-test design was used and improvements in clinical trial knowledge and beliefs were assessed. Results indicate that video modeling is a powerful tool for increasing CT knowledge (pretest mean=41.5% correct, post-test mean=77.5% correct) but not for improving CT beliefs. Increased clinical trial knowledge, as measured by change scores, was associated with white race, lower levels of education and pretest breast cancer knowledge, more negative pretest CT beliefs, and a higher estimate of the lifetime probability that a woman will have breast cancer. When pretest CT knowledge was added to the analysis using hierarchical multiple regression, all variables except white race became nonsignificant; an increase in CT knowledge was associated with having lower pretest CT knowledge. Results indicate that the effects of low education, low breast cancer knowledge, and biased probability assessment were mediated through the pretest score. An increase in post-test positive CT beliefs was associated with older age, thinking about breast cancer less often, and having lower pretest CT knowledge in the total sample. When pretest CT beliefs was added to the analysis using hierarchical multiple regression, all other variables became nonsignificant; an increase in CT beliefs was associated with having lower pretest CT beliefs, again indicating mediation of the effects of other variables.
Women's labor force participation has increased dramatically over the past several decades. Although previous research has documented that a wide array of labor market characteristics affect health, more work is needed to understand how women are impacted by gender-specific employment patterns and exposures. We examine a cohort of 659 employed women from the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study in the USA. Baseline and follow-up data collected 13 years apart are used to identify associations between demographic, labor market, work organization, and occupational gender inequality with four health outcomes: generalized distress, depressive syndrome, anxiety and fair or poor health. We also use gender-specific data on the workplace to create indicators of occupational gender inequality. We found wide gender inequalities in terms of pay and power in this sample of employed women. Financial strain was associated with all of our mental health outcomes with those reporting financial strain having increased odds of distress, depressive syndrome and anxiety for the 13 years prior to the interview. Workplace factors that were found to be associated with the four outcomes included experiencing a promotion or demotion in the 13 years prior to the interview; working at a large firm; and being a professional. Occupations where women compared to men had lower levels of job strain-domestic workers in private households, machine operator and transportation-showed increased risk for anxiety or fair/poor health. Our findings suggest that measuring the complexities of employment including promotion or demotion history, firm characteristics and even occupational gender inequality can yield important information about associations with health among women.
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy (CS) are commonly performed procedures that can cause anxiety related to potential findings, embarrassment and concern over discomfort. The objective of this study is to evaluate patient anxiety associated with diagnostic, sedated outpatient endoscopy and to correlate endoscopists' estimations of patient anxiety with those of the patient. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for diagnostic upper endoscopy or colonoscopy were evaluated. Anxiety was rated at baseline and immediately before the procedure using the State-Trait Anxiety Index (STAI-Y). Patients were categorized as whether they had been previously seen by a gastroenterologist in the clinic or were referred directly by another physician for endoscopy. Patients were also asked to rate their knowledge of the procedure using a visual analog scale. Physicians rated patient anxiety and procedure difficulty using 100 mm visual analog scales. Sedation administered during each procedure was recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled; 47 had been referred from the gastroenterology clinic and 47 had been directly referred from primary care physicians. Thirty-nine percent completed baseline and pre-procedure STAI-Y. Endoscopy was associated with a significant increase in state anxiety (baseline, 31.2 +/- 1.8; procedure, 39.8 +/- 2.2; P = 0.001) but not trait anxiety (baseline, 35.4 +/- 1.7; procedure, 36.2 +/- 1.6; P = 0.59). Procedural state anxiety was not influenced by age, sex, referral source, type of procedure or perceived procedural knowledge but was correlated with trait anxiety (r = 0.38; P = 0.02). Physician estimates of patient anxiety did not correlate with either procedural state anxiety (r = -0.15; P = 0.37) or the change in state anxiety from baseline to the procedure (r = -0.04; P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic outpatient endoscopy is associated with modest increases in state anxiety that are not significantly influenced by age, sex, procedure type, indication, or referral source. Endoscopists' ability to estimate patient anxiety is poor but this may reflect the generally mild increases in state anxiety that were encountered.