Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 14041582

[Acetabular protrusion].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W CERWENKA. 1963. [Acetabular protrusion].. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00415014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.

Reduction of the range of motion (ROM) until prosthetic impingement of a total hip replacement may lead to frequent impingement, subluxation and dislocation especially for patients with good hip movement. The ROM until prosthetic impingement can be calculated using the technical ROM (theta) and the cup and neck positions by a previously created mathematical formula. A larger (theta) with proper cup and neck positions results in a larger ROM. However there was only one paper written in English, which revealed the optimum theoretical combination of cup and neck anteversions. ROM of more than 110 degrees flexion, 30 degrees internal-rotation at 90 degrees flexion, 30 degrees extension and 40 degrees external-rotation were defined as the criteria for essential ROM for ADL. The safe-zones for combined cup anteversion (betaanat) and neck anteversion (b) were defined as the areas that fulfill all the criteria of ROM without prosthetic impingement. The safe-zones were created for 35 degrees , 45 degrees and 55 degrees cup abductions (alpha) and for 120 degrees and 135 degrees (theta). The safe-zones for combined (betaanat) and (b) were much larger for a 135 degrees (theta) than a 120 degrees (theta). Their safe-zones showed that (b) should be reduced if (betaanat) is increased and choosing a lower (alpha) requires that the sum of (betaanat) and (b) should be higher and vice versa. A (theta) of more than 135 degrees is recommended as it further increases the size of the safe-zone and provides a larger ROM, and the optimum values of combined cup and neck anteversions can be estimated by the formula: (alpha) + (betaanat) + 0.77(b) = 84.3.

Acetabulum↗

Problematic sites of third body embedment in polyethylene for total hip wear acceleration.

A computational model was developed to identify the sites of third body particle embedment in a total hip acetabular component surface that are most problematic in terms of roughening the overpassing regions of the femoral head counterface, leading in turn to most severely accelerated polyethylene wear. The analytical approach used was to calculate loci of acetabular sites that, during the gait cycle, overpass previously documented regions of kinetically most critical femoral head roughening. Instantaneous local contact stress and sliding distance were postulated as factors contributing to the severity of the femoral head scratching/roughening which would be expected, due to otherwise-similar particles embedded along each such acetabular overpass locus. The computational results showed that the location of debris embedment was a potent determinant of the amount of polyethylene wear acceleration expected. The data also showed that the supero-lateral aspect of the acetabular cup is consistently and by far the most problematic area for third body particle embedment.

Acetabulum↗

Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system.

In a prospective and randomised clinical study, acetabular cups were implanted free-hand (control group n=22) or with computer assistance using an image-free navigation system (study group n=23). The cup position was determined postoperatively on pelvic CT. An average inclination of 42.3 degrees (range: 30 degrees -53 degrees ; SD+/-7.0 degrees ) and an average anteversion of 24.0 degrees (range: -3 degrees to 51 degrees ; SD+/-15.0 degrees ) were found in the control group, and an average inclination of 45.0 degrees (range: 40 degrees -50 degrees ; SD+/-2.8 degrees ) and an average anteversion of 14.4 degrees (range: 5 degrees -25 degrees ; SS+/-5.0 degrees ) in the computer-assisted study group. The deviations from the desired cup position (45 degrees inclination, 15 degrees anteversion) were significantly lower in the computer-assisted study group (p<0.001 each). While only 11/22 of the cups in the control group were within the Lewinnek safe zone, 21/23 of the cups in the study group were placed in this target region (p=0.003).

Acetabulum↗