PubMed · 13769876
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K A METRAKOS. 1961. [Electron microscopy (advances-problems)].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13769876/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: In breast radiotherapy, delivery of manually-calculated electron boosts limits retrospective dose-response analyses as dose distribution is unavailable. This work evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast-conserving radiotherapy. METHODS: Only 72 out of 198 breast cancer patients had complete stored dose distributions from sequential electron boosts in the REQUITE study. Arbitrary data from 70/72 patients were used to develop and validate dose reconstruction method. Twenty patients were used to determine optimal parameters for Monte-Carlo-based (MC) electron dose reconstruction on RayStation (v.11B-R), considering CT-calibration curve, MC-history number, andcalculation grid resolution. Remaining 50 patients were used to quantify dose reconstruction accuracy. The similarity between reconstructed and stored dose was evaluated using 3D-gamma index and dosimetric parameters extracted from breast and tumour bed contours. Dose difference location was evaluated using dose-location histogram. RESULTS: Calculation grid resolution significantly impacted electron dose distribution (p < 0.01), where the finest grid (0.15 cm) showed highest similarity to stored doses. CT-calibration curve and MC-history number had a negligible influence on dose reconstruction. Dosimetric difference between reconstructed and stored doses was < 1 Gy for breast and tumour bed. Reconstructed dose was achieved > 90% gamma passing rate in the validation set. However, around 2.5 Gy dose differences were observed at the skin and tissue interface regions. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective electron boost dose reconstruction is feasible with acceptable accuracy, and could increase data completeness in large cohort studies. Caution is advised when assessing dose near tissue interface and further validation is needed outside the REQUITE dataset.
The results are presented of measurements of protonation constants (potentiometry and NMR), UV spectroscopic properties and redox potentials of GSH and its five analogues, which are modified at the C-terminal glycine residue (gammaGlu-Cys-X, X = Gly, Gly-NH2, Gly-OEt, Ala, Glu, Ser). Strong linear correlations were found between various properties of the thiol and other functions of these peptides. These results allow discussion of the relationships between the structures and properties in glutathione and its analogues, and provide a novel chemical background for the issue of control of GSH reactivity.
Recent experiments indicated the existence of hydration shells about biomolecules with densities markedly higher than that of bulk water. The compression is due to the pull of the dipoles of H(2)O molecules, necessary to achieve the thermodynamic equilibrium, from bulk water into the high field (approx. 10(9) V/m) region at the surface of the protein molecule. The electric field values at the surfaces of the biomolecules are calculated on the basis of the known densities. The reverse calculation of the limiting density values on the basis of known electric field distributions is performed, too. The results compare favourably with experiment.