PubMed · 13729410
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J NOECKER. 1960-11-12. [Poorly regulated circulation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13729410/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Until recently the physiological role of magnesium was essentially ignored. However, with the development of new technologies to measure the intracellular free concentration of magnesium ([Mg2+]i), the biologically important fraction, there has been an explosion of interest in the molecular, biochemical, physiological and pharmacological functions of magnesium. In addition improved methods for assessing magnesium status in the clinic have contributed to the further understanding of magnesium regulation in health and disease. Magnesium deficiency is now considered to contribute to many diseases and the role for magnesium as a therapeutic agent is being tested in numerous large clinical trials. This review focuses on clinical manifestations associated with magnesium deficiency and highlights the clinical significance of hypermagnesemia. Specific clinical conditions in which magnesium deficiency has been implicated to play a pathophysiological role, namely hypertension, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, prec-eclampsia, asthma and critical illness will be discussed and the possible therapeutic role of magnesium will be considered. Although there is still much to be learnt regarding the exact role of magnesium in clinical medicine, there are two conditions where magnesium is now considered the therapeutic agent of choice, pre-eclampsia and torsades de pointes. Future research, both at the fundamental and clinical levels, will certainly facilitate our understanding of how magnesium contributes to pathological processes and under what circumstances it should be used therapeutically.
The divergent findings of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) from observational and randomized clinical studies are summarized and reasons for the different results are postulated. Chronic use of HRT since menopause has no harmful effects on CHD event rate, while the initiation of therapy after a recent cardiovascular event causes an early increase in recurrent CHD events. Once endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerotic disease has developed, the starting of HRT promotes plaque instability, vascular inflammation and prothrombotic effects. The timing of HRT use since menopause is therefore crucial in the effectiveness and safety of HRT on the vascular system.
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence of the efficacy of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease or stroke. RESULTS: Although a number of rather large and prolonged non-randomized observational studies have produced convincing and consistent evidence of the efficacy of HRT in the prevention of recurrence of cardiac events, the first randomized, placebo controlled trial (RCT) on heart disease and estrogen replacement study (HERS) reported no benefit of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in secondary prevention of cardiac events in women with established coronary artery disease. This was supported by RCT reporting no effect of CEE or CEE + MPA on the progress of coronary sclerosis. Similarly, some nonrandomized observational studies have evaluated the risk of recurrent stroke in regard to the use of HRT, and the data are conflicting reporting a reduced or increased risk of recurrence for HRT users. One RCT has shown that low-dose estrogen treatment can only slow down the progression of carotid arteriosclerosis in high-risk postmenopausal women, whereas two other RCTs have shown no benefit (or risk) of using HRT for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or progression of carotid atherosclerosis. CONCLUSION: The evidence accumulated so far shows that HRT has no place in secondary prevention of coronary or carotic artery disease. Its use in these patients must be based on solid nonvascular indications and expected benefits from these causes.