Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 1366953

Repacking protein interiors.

Abstract

Several goals of protein engineering may be achieved through redesign and repacking of protein interiors. The effects of interior apolar substitutions on protein stability depend strongly on the site of the substitution. One reason for this is that protein interiors have properties both of apolar liquids and of crystalline solids. Substitutions at interior sites affect the stability of a protein by changing the hydrophobicity, but each site in a protein has a characteristic energy associated with introducing packing changes, and the net stability depends on both of these factors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W S Sandberg, T C Terwilliger. 1991. Repacking protein interiors.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(91)90190-s

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Electrostatic interactions across a beta-sheet.

The free energy consequences of electrostatic interactions across a model beta-sheet have been probed using a consensus zinc finger peptide. Relative folding free energies have been deduced from coupled peptide folding/metal binding reactions. The energies of the electrostatic interactions have been isolated via double mutant cycles performed at a series of NaCl concentrations. The observed favorable free energies associated with potential ion pairs are modest, less than 0.5 kcal/mol. Unfavorable interactions due to like-charge pairs of similar magnitude were also observed. The largest effects, both favorable and unfavorable, involved interactions with aspartic acid. These observations are consistent with electrostatic interactions occurring without contact ion pair formation with the larger interaction energies involving aspartic acid being due to the relative lack of flexibility of its side chain.

Models, Chemical

Improved parameters for the prediction of RNA hairpin stability.

Thermodynamic parameters are reported for hairpin formation in 1 M NaCl by RNA sequences of the type GGXANmAYCC, where XY is the set of four Watson-Crick base pairs and the underlined loop sequences are three to nine nucleotides. A nearest neighbor analysis of the data indicates the free energy of loop formation at 37 degrees C is dependent upon loop size and closing base pair. The model previously developed to predict the stability for RNA hairpin loops (n > 3) includes contributions from the size of the loop, the identity of the closing base pair, the free energy increment (deltaGo(37mm)) for the interaction of the closing base pair with the first mismatch and an additional stabilization term for GA and UU first mismatches [Serra, M. J., Axenson, T. J., & Turner, D. H. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 14289]. The results presented here allow improvements in the parameters used to predict RNA hairpin stability. For hairpin loops of n = 4-9, deltaGo(37iL)(n) is 4.9, 5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 4.9, and 5.5 kcal/mol, respectively, and the penalty for hairpin closure by AU or UA is +0.6 kcal/mol. deltaGo(37iL)(n) is the free energy for initiating a loop of n nucleotides. The model for predicting hairpin loop stability for loops larger than three becomes deltaGo(37L)(n) = deltaGo(37iL)(n) + deltaGo(37mm) + 0.6(if closed by AU or UA) - 0.7(if first mismatch is GA or UU). Hairpin loops of three are modeled as independent of loop sequence with deltaGo(37iL)(3) = 4.8 and the penalty for AU closure of +0.6 kcal/mol. Thermodynamic parameters for hairpin formation in 1 M NaCl for 11 naturally occurring RNA hairpin sequences are reported. The model provides good agreement with the measured values for both T(M) (within 10 degrees C of the measured value) and deltaGo(37) (within 0.8 kcal/mol of the measured value) for hairpin formation. In general, the nearest neighbor model allows prediction of RNA hairpin stability to within 5-10% of the experimentally measured values.

Models, Chemical