PubMed · 13580787
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J P MARR, B N NATHANSON. 1958. Extraperitoneal cesarean section.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13580787/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the current influence of educational attainment and occupation on maternal obstetrical risk associated with cesarean section under the conditions of an industrialized country and provision of universal coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The perinatal survey data 1998-2001 of the German state of Baden-Württemberg were studied comparing method of delivery for the different occupational categories raised in the survey and the influence of antenatal care utilization. For statistical analysis chi square test, Fisher's exact test and chi square test for trends were used. Relative risks describe the risk for the exposed. RESULTS: Cesarean section rate increased for all groups over the studied four years period. High rates of surgical deliveries were found for the categories "high salaried position" and "unskilled workers". Housewives, the largest group of pregnant women in Baden-Württemberg, delivered significantly less often by cesarean section (75% vaginal deliveries) than women of all other groups (66% vaginal deliveries on the average). In case of low utilization of antenatal care (<5 checks) risk of cesarean section and rate of complications (as blood loss >1,000 ml, hysterectomy) associated with cesarean section are significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in an individual woman's risk of having a cesarean section is, besides many other factors, associated with occupation. Antenatal care promotion should target the collective of unskilled workers, at special risk for insufficient use of prenatal care and high rate of cesarean delivery.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare the efficacy and the safety of different regimens of misoprostol for labor induction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible women received intravaginal 100 microg, every 6 h or 50 microg every 4 h. Treatment continued until: (1) dilatation >3 cm; (2) rupture of membranes (artificial); (3) signs of uterine hyperstimulation; (4) adequate contraction pattern (three contraction/10 min). Managing clinician might use oxytocin during labor. Cesarean section rate was the main outcome that was considered variably. Other outcome measures were neonatal outcome (Apgar scores, meconium staining, and umbilical artery pH) and induction to delivery interval. RESULTS: A total number of 72 women received either misoprostol 100 microg (n=37), or 50 microg (n=35) randomly. The two groups had similar mean Bishops scores at induction (4.10+/-2.4 versus 4.2+/-2.1; P=0.85), rates of nulliparity, use of epidural anesthesia, and oxytocin augmentation. In two groups the number of doses of misoprostol used was similar (1.6+/-0.5 versus 1.7+/-0.3) CONCLUSION: There was not any difference between the two groups in the mean+/-S.D. time to delivery (h) and cesarean rate. Likewise, there was not a significance between two groups in the rates of 5 min Apgar score, and of meconium passage.