PubMed · 13548956
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
SISTER DANILE. 1958. Portable unit solves donor problems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13548956/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) are a common complication of platelet concentrate (PC) and RBC transfusions, usually ascribed to cytokines released by WBCs and perhaps the platelets themselves during storage. Prestorage WBC reduction should abrogate the accumulation of these cytokines reducing the number of FNHTRs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of FNHTR to PCs and RBCs before universal WBC reduction (PrUR) (July 1997-January 1998 for PCs, July 1997-July 1999 for RBCs) and after its introduction (PoUR) (February 1998-August 2001 for PC, August 1999-August 2001 for RBCs) was undertaken. All transfusion reactions were stratified based on component and date of reaction. Other adverse transfusion reactions were grouped into three periods: July 1997-January 1998, February 1998-July 1999, and August 1999-August 2001. A chi-square test was performed to determine the significance of the differences between groups. RESULTS: In the PRUR group, there were: 231 FNHTRs in 70,396 RBC units transfused (0.33%) and 29 FNHTRs in 6502 PC units transfused (0.45% percent). In the PoUR group, there were 136 FNHTRs in 72,949 RBC units transfused (0.19%, p < 0.001) and 56 FNHTRs in 50,555 PC units transfused (0.11%, p < 0.001). Of the other adverse events, only TRALI reactions were significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Prestorage WBC reduction significantly reduced the rate of FNHTRs to PCs and RBCs.
BACKGROUND: Between January 1995 and November 1998, at Yale-New Haven Hospital, 25 percent of RBCs transfused were processed through prestorage or bedside leukoreduction filters, chosen on a per patient basis (selective leukoreduction [SLR]). Between January 1995 and July 1999, 30 percent of platelet concentrates (PCs) were infused through bedside leukoreduction filters. In an attempt to decrease febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR), a change was made from SLR to universal prestorage leukoreduction (UPL) for RBCs between November 1998 and December 1999 and for random donor PCs between July 1999 and January 2000. FNHTR and allergic transfusion reactions (ATR) reported from January 1995 through December 2002 were reviewed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For retrospective observational analysis, blood bank data were available on the number of RBCs and PCs transfused, percent products leukoreduced, and rate of FNHTR and ATR from 1995 through December 2002. After dividing this time period into three phases (SLR, transition, and UPL), these data were evaluated using odds ratio (ORs) and Student's t tests. RESULTS: A total of 145,369 RBCs and 137,982 PCs (29,487 PC pools) transfused between January 1995 and December 2002 were evaluated. For RBCs, the relative FNHTR rate decreased 47.1 percent, from 0.34 percent (SLR) to 0.18 percent (UPL) (p < 0.0001). ATR rates for RBCs showed 0.09 percent for both SLR and UPL groups (p > 0.05, NS). For PCs, the FNHTR relative rate decreased 93.1 percent, from 2.18 percent for SLR to 0.15 percent for UPL (p < 0.0001). Rates for ATR were 0.49 percent (SLR) and 0.35 percent (UPL) (p > 0.05, NS). CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease in the frequency of posttransfusion FNHTR, but not ATR, for RBCs and PCs followed introduction of 100-percent UPL. The data support the hypothesis that the practice of UPL of RBCs and PCs decreases the frequency of FNHTR and thus improves patient care over the practice of selective leukoreduction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.