PubMed · 1353562
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1992-08-15. Selection for audit.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1353562/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The role of the radiologist in 'out of hours' radiology was prospectively studied in a single Scottish Health Board for a continuous 6 month period. Six hundred and sixty seven procedures were performed by radiologists. Computed tomography (CT) (274, 41%), ultrasound scans (190, 28.5%) and vascular/interventional procedures (60, 9%) were the most frequently performed procedures. Trauma accounted for 139 (24%) of all 'out of hours' work and overall 365 (54.7%) procedures yielded an abnormality. The workload varied widely between hospitals from two procedures per 100 beds to 137 procedures per 100 beds. Similarly the input from individual radiologists was very variable. A registrar was present for 227 (34%) procedures, a senior registrar for 360 (54%) and a consultant for 138 (20%) (there being two radiologists present for 8.7% of procedures). 'Consultant only' radiology departments offering a full radiological service may expect a substantial 'out of hours' commitment.
The accuracy of cancer registration data in the East of Scotland (Tayside) Cancer Registry was audited by comparing 200 consecutive registrations (about 10% of the annual total) with the 'gold standard' of the Histopathology records. ICD codes were independently generated by a pathologist by examining final pathology reports and then compared to those codes given by the local cancer registrar. Discrepancies were graded by the pathologist and the epidemiologist according to severity. Major errors of coding were few. Minor and moderate differences in coding occurred because of the nature and structure of the coding system and the manner in which data are retrieved. The level of detail required by the Cancer Registry needs to be evaluated.